Prayer Woman

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1114480 times)

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #315 on: June 29, 2018, 01:11:57 AM »
Alan, thanks for bringing that over, I'm a bit disabled at the present HW wise, so we have the Wiegman gif that shows "BL" going... down/up, when he's up, he's leaning and it syncs with Altgens v nicely, seconds apart at the most, so I'm still satisified atm it's the same shirted man.
If I found the closer cropped version of Hughes you might see evidence of PM there(I think we do), it's just a splash of something, can't remember noticing what you are pointing to before now but my instinct tells me it could be evidence of Frazier.
Yes, in response to your latest post, you need the closer crop to see evidence of PM, there is minor evidence that someone is already in PM's position behind what you circled, can't remember if the Bell film helps this or not...

Can you see the black guy clapping then putting his big hand up to wave? Might be just my imagination but if true then inspiration enough for anyone behind him to move.







Have to share.
Imagine if Lovelady, instead of doing everything to protect his private life from "the buffs" actually capitalized on his fame, like Frazier did as time went on,
would it look something like this?
Damn song stuck in my head.
This isn't real... reggae.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #316 on: June 29, 2018, 01:29:08 AM »
Actually MrFord, I don't recall any proof to rebut, and have seen nothing to be a clear demonstration that the dark border cannot be a shadow, regardless of origin. ::)

I cordially refer Mr Trotter to Reply#801 on this thread. Looking forward to his rebuttal of my analysis!  Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #317 on: June 29, 2018, 01:30:49 AM »
Have to share.
Imagine if Lovelady, instead of doing everything to protect his private life from "the buffs" actually capitalized on his fame, like Frazier did as time went on,
would it look something like this?
Damn song stuck in my head.
This isn't real... reggae.

We already have a barmy Two Oswalds theory, so why not two Loveladys too?   :D
« Last Edit: June 29, 2018, 02:01:08 AM by Alan Ford »

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #318 on: June 29, 2018, 01:37:48 AM »
RE: Stanton not being able to see the President.
Look at Shelley in Altgens, is he able to see the President? Clearly not, because he's just not trying/bothered.
Sarah too only has to be looking the other way to not see him, not stuck behind some pillar/wall.
Turn on, tune in or drop out.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #319 on: June 29, 2018, 02:09:32 AM »




The reason we never noticed Billy in the Billy-in-Wiegman area was
-------------------we only had eyes for a red shirt! :'(
« Last Edit: June 29, 2018, 02:15:41 AM by Alan Ford »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #320 on: June 29, 2018, 02:28:31 AM »
What I have not seen is, any calculations allowing for the angle of the TSBD Building and/or entrance portal.

So you are alleging that Andrej Stancak made his digital recreation of the entrance area without considering the angle of the TSBD building and/or entrance portal? That's a very serious allegation to make, Mr Trotter. What evidence do you have for it? More to the point: what evidence have you looked for? Have you gone to Mr Stancak's website and perused his detailed explanations of how the recreation was undertaken? Yes or no? Have you specific data-based grounds upon which to refute the angle at which he puts the TSBD Building and/or entrance portal? Yes or no? Or are you just blowing hot air?

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #321 on: June 29, 2018, 02:50:00 AM »
It appears to me that the sunlight angles are important to someone wishing to qualify mannequin placement on a virtual landing/stairway portal. But, azimuth calculations are trivial to most of us that study the reliable provable evidence indicative of said portal occupants as the area was filmed. To state Stancek has "the shadows exactly right in his creations", can only be a conclusion, nothing more. I certainly question his "insertions" of images, especially those not seen otherwise, and as well his "to scale measurements".
And, I do not recall ever stating that sunlight origin calculations had no bearing on shadow length and/or shadow angle. What I have not seen is, any calculations allowing for the angle of the TSBD Building and/or entrance portal.
Most important though, when you say that if I can't see something you state, you can't be bothered anymore, and "It's like casting pearls before swine", tell me, exactly what are you saying? Are you indicating something negative about my character?

Bumped for MrAlanFord, should he wish to accurately quote this post made earlier in this thread as a reply to a post by MrRayMitcham.