Prayer Woman

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1114996 times)

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #581 on: July 13, 2018, 12:28:34 PM »


Is it a 'known factor' whether or not each of, and/or both of, the film stills/pictures as shown here include any alteration(s) of, and/or enhancement(s)to, PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage?

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #582 on: July 13, 2018, 01:25:32 PM »
Is it a 'known factor' whether or not each of, and/or both of, the film stills/pictures as shown here include any alteration(s) of, and/or enhancement(s)to, PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage?

Larry - that's a nice GIF by I'm assuming Chris "boil an egg" - "every single god-xxxxed film and photo of the assassination is fake" Davidson.

Chris Davidson? Who is so crazy with his mathematical formulas that Peg Barker's forum actually has a hilarious parody of his weirdly funny Swan Song Math Rules post on the Ed Forum?

* I had Parker's URL here but this system scrubbed it - look it up and you'll find it * skunk-smells-math-sucks

What is your point here, Larry?  Are you now saying that these films were somehow - GASP! - faked or altered in some way? And for whatever reason, Larry?

I mean, come on.  Let's stay on point here.

Offline Chris Davidson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #583 on: July 13, 2018, 04:28:23 PM »


Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #584 on: July 13, 2018, 08:52:58 PM »
Larry - that's a nice GIF by I'm assuming Chris "boil an egg" - "every single god-xxxxed film and photo of the assassination is fake" Davidson.

Chris Davidson? Who is so crazy with his mathematical formulas that Peg Barker's forum actually has a hilarious parody of his weirdly funny Swan Song Math Rules post on the Ed Forum?

* I had Parker's URL here but this system scrubbed it - look it up and you'll find it * skunk-smells-math-sucks

What is your point here, Larry?  Are you now saying that these films were somehow - GASP! - faked or altered in some way? And for whatever reason, Larry?

I mean, come on.  Let's stay on point here.

Actually Michael, I asked a relative question, and was not stating anything. Should curiosity be applied, the accuracy of any image of the two scenes overlaid can be a judgement call.
However, the PrayerWomanImage position, indicative sizing, and stance angle are not as I recall seeing on earlier pictured scene versions.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2018, 07:48:38 PM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #585 on: July 13, 2018, 09:19:52 PM »
Question!

Based on the respective reflections in the glass door of Frazier and the man (?) to his left, is it safe to say that Frazier is further back on the landing than said man?



Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #586 on: July 14, 2018, 01:19:49 AM »
^
Anyone who's watched Darnell enough will know the door is moving based on the changing reflection in the glass...

Alan,
yes I for one can see the difference but perhaps Frazier's was on the solid glass panel and Stanton's was on the (moving)door, would that matter? Wouldn't mind seeing more frames like that in motion...

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #587 on: July 14, 2018, 05:30:35 PM »
Brian, STOP referring people to other venues to view YOUR images. If you have one of YOUR image analysis to discuss, post the Friggin thing here.

When Alan refers to an image, he posts it here. There's no reason apart from your laziness, that you can't or won't do the same.