Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 533139 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #328 on: June 29, 2018, 01:02:49 PM »
Advertisement
CE151, the shirt LHO wore to work that day:




JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #328 on: June 29, 2018, 01:02:49 PM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #329 on: June 29, 2018, 01:25:17 PM »


Oops!  :-X

Source:

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #330 on: June 29, 2018, 02:29:06 PM »
I do not recall making statements attributed to me by MrRayMitcham in this post. Perhaps he can provide any quotes along with his explanation for his statement(s).

Quote by Larry Trotter. ( Reply #812 on: June 28, 2018, 06:32:13 PM)
"I agree that the azimuth calculations are trivial, but there is a lot of indicative reliance on sunlight shadow calculations relative to the TSBD Bldg Elm St entrance portal and/or the occupants at about 12:01pm/01:00pm CST (12:01/13:00) on 11/22/'63.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #330 on: June 29, 2018, 02:29:06 PM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #331 on: June 29, 2018, 02:32:33 PM »
Someone a bit further down the street, Ray. IIRC someone offered a pretty convincing candidate from the Towner film a few years back!

I believe that it is Lovelady's arm in the photo, not some unknown down person down the street.

It seems  this is confirmed by bucket filling the shirt that he is wearing in yellow, which shows that it is exactly the same colour. You may have to enlarge to see the detail.


Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #332 on: June 29, 2018, 02:38:10 PM »
Very well said, Ray!

As MrAlanFord has expressed his approval and agreement with MrRayMitcham's comments as posted regarding a statement made by me, maybe he can provide a quote, the full statement quote, and explain what it is that he is referring to.
« Last Edit: March 29, 2019, 03:20:23 AM by Larry Trotter »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #332 on: June 29, 2018, 02:38:10 PM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #333 on: June 29, 2018, 02:40:38 PM »
Quote by Larry Trotter. ( Reply #812 on: June 28, 2018, 06:32:13 PM)
"I agree that the azimuth calculations are trivial, but there is a lot of indicative reliance on sunlight shadow calculations relative to the TSBD Bldg Elm St entrance portal and/or the occupants at about 12:01pm/01:00pm CST (12:01/13:00) on 11/22/'63.
Bump for Mr Trotter.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #334 on: June 29, 2018, 02:43:01 PM »
It appears to me that the sunlight angles are important to someone wishing to qualify mannequin placement on a virtual landing/stairway portal. But, azimuth calculations are trivial to most of us that study the reliable provable evidence indicative of said portal occupants as the area was filmed. To state Stancek has "the shadows exactly right in his creations", can only be a conclusion, nothing more. I certainly question his "insertions" of images, especially those not seen otherwise, and as well his "to scale measurements".
And, I do not recall ever stating that sunlight origin calculations had no bearing on shadow length and/or shadow angle. What I have not seen is, any calculations allowing for the angle of the TSBD Building and/or entrance portal.
Most important though, when you say that if I can't see something you state, you can't be bothered anymore, and "It's like casting pearls before swine", tell me, exactly what are you saying? Are you indicating something negative about my character?

Bumped for MrRayMitcham to review.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #334 on: June 29, 2018, 02:43:01 PM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #335 on: June 29, 2018, 03:13:36 PM »
I believe that it is Lovelady's arm in the photo, not some unknown down person down the street.

It seems  this is confirmed by bucket filling the shirt that he is wearing in yellow, which shows that it is exactly the same colour. You may have to enlarge to see the detail.



Depends on the Tolerance setting and where on the image one clicks!

« Last Edit: June 29, 2018, 03:20:12 PM by Alan Ford »