Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1236689 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1953 on: August 15, 2019, 07:53:23 AM »
The CIA has performed terribly through the years. They spend more on fixing mistakes than anything else. Military intelligence has a far better structure for accountability Too many daydreamers in the CIA. You understand

Dear Peter,

I concur.  But on a different level. 

The worst CIA daydreamers of them all were those wishful and/or spiteful, under-endowded "thinkers" like Leonard McCoy, John L. Hart, Bruce Solie and Richards J. Heuer who so desperately wanted to believe that Yuri Nosenko was a true defector, that the KGB had had nothing to do with Lee Harvey Oswald while he was living in the USSR, and, most importantly, that KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn was all wet in his claims that Popov had been betrayed by a mole in U.S. Intelligence, that Penkovsky had been betrayed by a mole in British or U.S. Intelligence, and that there was, in 1959, created a top-secret "KGB within the KGB," known officially as "Department 14 of the Second Chief Directorate" (the SCD being today's FSB).

Thereby tearing CIA counter- intelligence efforts against the Kremlin apart, and unwittingly(?) clearing the way for someone like Aldrich Ames to betray the U.S. for nine years, etc, etc, etc.

Enter, in no particular order, Oliver Stone's JFK, "Anna Chapman and The Eleven Dwarfs Spy Ring," James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio, Tommy Mangold, Jefferson "Intellectually Dishonest" Morley, oodles and gobs of tinfoil hat conspiracy theories, and ... gasp ... Donald "Useful Idiot" Trump For President!

-- MWT  ;)


« Last Edit: August 15, 2019, 08:34:37 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1954 on: August 19, 2019, 06:46:39 AM »
Where's that Lovelace guy?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1955 on: August 20, 2019, 08:19:14 PM »


::)
REPEAT: If provable indicative information of evidentiary value can be provided supporting YOUR conclusions of said subject matter, perhaps YOU can provide said information(?).

I don't have any conclusions of said subject matter.  Now where is your provable indicative information of evidentiary value?

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5238
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1956 on: August 23, 2019, 11:58:01 PM »
What do you even think is a coffee percolator?



JohnM

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1957 on: August 24, 2019, 06:52:43 AM »
Nope, it looks like it could be a coffee-scoop and it appears to be sitting right next to the white edge of the hotplates?



What we can see of the kitchen table top is flat because "we" can see the kettles reflection and besides "we" can determine the width of that area by comparing it to the hotplates and it appears to be only about 5 to 7 inches wide and doesn't a tap need a sink?



JohnM
I was waiting for you to say there is a rifle somewhere in the picture.  More importantly, Oswald did not have a kitchen in his backyard

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1958 on: August 24, 2019, 09:47:30 AM »
I believe that Carolyn Arnold is hiding in the cupboard under the brown paper sack.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1959 on: August 24, 2019, 05:47:24 PM »
Where?