Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1223167 times)

Offline Matthew Finch

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1869 on: June 04, 2019, 11:16:02 AM »
This....... is a job for........ Ralph Cinque !!!

Careful Mark - say it twice more and he may actually be summoned!

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1870 on: June 04, 2019, 06:14:21 PM »
Oh okay, that actually helps, so, if Molina were say, 5.8'(which I doubt he was) then from my POV his hands would have to be between 4-5" above his head to hit the shadow.  You really want to continue with this?

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1871 on: June 04, 2019, 06:29:22 PM »
Enough jibberjabber...

I am very aware of the films that show cops and others stepping up onto the landing because that's exactly what I'm talking about, link us to one that proves your point(here's a tip btw, free of charge, try to find a clip that shows a short lady about 5.5 or less, oitherwise you're xxxxxx).

Stay with me anyway, show me footage that "proves the lintel's shadow wouldn't hit the head of everyone over 5.5', as soon as they stepped up onto the landing" and I'll be in your debt.

Show me or gtfoomf.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1872 on: June 05, 2019, 11:20:40 AM »
Ok, first of all, well done for finding an example and something that wasn't in this thread, which is a lil' weird, since I based my conclusion on numerous examples that were posted here.
But seriously, it's too hard to tell in that form, perhaps a looped gif might prove you correct but did you notice it's quite a short guy?
Anyway if you can tell his hair from the shadow from that source alone, more power to you, I however cannot.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1873 on: June 06, 2019, 06:55:34 AM »
He's not on the landing because Stanton's not beside him, she moved to the street that's why she's not beside him and that's why he's not on the landing because Lee H Oswald rules and Bart is gay.  Cowabunga.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1874 on: June 15, 2019, 06:40:38 AM »
...
The PrayerPerson is in my conclusion, representing a female

Yes you've said but you've still yet to explain why you think it's female despite me personally asking you five times.  Now's your golden opportunity, we're all ears.  You have the floo-ur.

Now, with a history changing event like the LeeHarveyOswald/PrayerManTheory, stories can be told, and articles written, likely by professional story tellers and article writers. And possibly a book, or several books, can be written and then sold. Maybe even a movie or two can be made.

Do I detect a kooky theory?  An ulterior motive yee thinks?  Sacré bleu.
So how would it change anything, I'm curious.  Could it be because, no, in your quirky view LHO is actually guilty now?  What happened to you Larry?  I thought you were on our team.

Testimony and sworn statements offer  ONLY CIRCUMSTANCIAL evidence...
In any event, amatuer(at best) "research" from one "JFK researcher" who no one agrees with on anything has concocted the lamest "circumstantial evidence" indicative of SarahStanton as being Prayer Man.

FTFY(google it Tommy)

Although the LeeHarveyOswald/PrayerManTheory continues to be just that, a theory, said PrayerWomanImage identity conclusions are based on provable reliable indicative evidence.

Only in your Youtube dreams.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1875 on: June 16, 2019, 02:06:14 AM »
The reason you have so many, many little pots on the fire is because you have not one single thing that proves Stanton is PM.  This is so obvious I feel ridiculous just typing it but this is typically the level of debate only you can inspire.