Prayer Woman

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1112026 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1750 on: April 20, 2019, 07:05:45 PM »
Also, if you "can't accept the idea that the person is Lee Oswald", just remember, neither did multiple eyewitnesses/co-workers on the landing/stairs at the time, nor did they ever indicate accepting said idea:-\

Mr Oswald certainly indicated accepting such an idea!  Thumb1:



The scamp obviously foresaw the Prayer Man controversy that would erupt a half century later, and decided to mess with our heads for the fun of it!

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1751 on: April 21, 2019, 02:18:20 AM »
Mr Oswald certainly indicated accepting such an idea!  Thumb1:



The scamp obviously foresaw the Prayer Man controversy that would erupt a half century later, and decided to mess with our heads for the fun of it!

The scamp obviously foresaw the Prayer Man controversy that would erupt a half century later, and decided to mess with our heads for the fun of it!

How utterly ludicrous!!

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1752 on: April 21, 2019, 04:30:50 PM »
Mr Oswald certainly indicated accepting such an idea!  Thumb1:



The scamp obviously foresaw the Prayer Man controversy that would erupt a half century later, and decided to mess with our heads for the fun of it!

The scamp obviously foresaw the Prayer Man controversy that would erupt a half century later, and decided to mess with our heads for the fun of it!

How utterly ludicrous!!
???Surely it is not being claimed that the hand written notes were written by the hand of LeeHarveyOswald. There is also not any indication of the said notes being notorized. And, I have to wonder, as I wander, exactly when were the said notes written? Also, I do not see, as claimed, anything in said notes claiming that LeeHarveyOswald was on the landing, on the west side of the small landing, during the shooting and/or portal area filming.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1753 on: April 21, 2019, 05:56:38 PM »
???Surely it is not being claimed that the hand written notes were written by the hand of LeeHarveyOswald. There is also not any indication of the said notes being notorized. And, I have to wonder, as I wander, exactly when were the said notes written? Also, I do not see, as claimed, anything in said notes claiming that LeeHarveyOswald was on the landing, on the west side of the small landing, during the shooting and/or portal area filming.


I believe the notes are those that were scribbled by FBI agent James Bookhout during the second interrogation of Lee Oswald....

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1754 on: April 21, 2019, 07:20:52 PM »
???Surely it is not being claimed that the hand written notes were written by the hand of LeeHarveyOswald.


I believe the notes are those that were scribbled by FBI agent James Bookhout during the second interrogation of Lee Oswald....

God grant us patience!  ::)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1755 on: April 22, 2019, 02:16:22 AM »
God grant us patience!  ::)

Alan, how long are you going to keep milking the curtain rod story?.....  It's very obvious that the authorities were playing "fool the pissants" and creating forged documents .     Do you really think you can go beyond that fact?

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1756 on: April 22, 2019, 06:05:00 AM »
FWIW, Mr Cakebread, and this is not intended to be a debate, my take is that PrayerPersonImage is holding in their right hand, with assistance from the left hand, and drinking from, a cup that contains either a beverage, or possibly soup. After all, it was lunchtime. In any event, wearing a long coat, and with a small purse/handbag attached/strapped to the left forearm.

Also, if you "can't accept the idea that the person is Lee Oswald", just remember, neither did multiple eyewitnesses/co-workers on the landing/stairs at the time, nor did they ever indicate accepting said idea! 

Hey brains, like it or not that's exactly what the discussion forum accommodates, debate.  That would include interacting with your "opposition" in a meaningful way, by answering their tricky questions for one, instead of whatever it is you think you are doing, I have no idea, it all seems very alien to me.

Your "take" isn't even yours, it didn't come from you, you certainly didn't create the stabilized gif that led to that observation and you weren't the first to observe it or comment on it.  "... a beverage, or possibly soup." you say, even that's not original, you're just repeating the same crap others have already wondered about.

"wearing a long coat, and with a small purse/handbag attached/strapped to the left forearm".
'That's not #PM, that's Scarflady in Hughes and something else that others claimed to see before you on the Wiegman troll, blowup.
How about telling us why you'd trust that eyesore over the Darnell frames anyway, especially since you're already on record in this thread claiming you(iirc) "...didn't trust these "enhancements""?

"Also, if you "can't accept the idea that the person is Lee Oswald", just remember, neither did multiple eyewitnesses/co-workers on the landing/stairs at the time, nor did they ever indicate accepting said idea! "

No one was asked, "could LHO have come out late and stood on the top step behind you while you were watching the parade approach from Houston?".  I mean, it's fine if you don't believe it, just bring some game, make an effort at least, instead of this lame junk you keep repeating exactly like a troll would do.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2019, 06:15:50 AM by Barry Pollard »