Buell Wesley Frazier

[Jack Nessan]

I see.  So your arrogantly expressed, contrived interpretation is automatically superior to any other interpretation, because . . . reasons.  Believe whatever you like, but don't call it "logic".  She said NOTHING about the left hand, no matter how badly you want it to mean that.

  There is nothing about that description that tells you a single thing about how long the package was.  And her estimate was 27-28 1/2 inches.

Wow John. Such vitriol. All I did was point out your wild speculation seemingly without full knowledge of Linnie May’s statement and suddenly you become a poster child for everything you don’t like about everyone else’s posting. Maybe it would be better to post Cool Story Bro or LOL.


 Here I will post it again and you can take another shot at it. It would be nice to see a better answer.

"My fault for not posting her complete statement on how the bag was being carried as you obviously were unaware of what she had already stated about the top of the package before she focuses on the bottom of it . She had already explained how the top was being carried and then she shifted her explanation to the bottom by stating “and”--- “and the bottom”. So, you are now speculating she now explains again how the top was being held? By using the word “bottom” That actually makes sense to you? John. logic is your specialty don’t let it fail you now."

 

[Jack Nessan]

When all else fails, trot out a ridiculous strawman.

A ridiculous strawman answer for a ridiculous strawman answer. A little biased?

The bigger question is when did start packing water for Capasse?

[John Iacoletti]

Wow John. Such vitriol. All I did was point out your wild speculation seemingly without full knowledge of Linnie May’s statement and suddenly you become a poster child for everything you don’t like about everyone else’s posting. Maybe it would be better to post Cool Story Bro or LOL.


 Here I will post it again and you can take another shot at it. It would be nice to see a better answer.

"My fault for not posting her complete statement on how the bag was being carried as you obviously were unaware of what she had already stated about the top of the package before she focuses on the bottom of it . She had already explained how the top was being carried and then she shifted her explanation to the bottom by stating “and”--- “and the bottom”. So, you are now speculating she now explains again how the top was being held? By using the word “bottom” That actually makes sense to you? John. logic is your specialty don’t let it fail you now."

It's not vitriol.  You think your wild speculation is somehow superior to any other wild speculation.  And you thinking couching it in smug, condescending language somehow makes it something other than wild speculation.

Meanwhile, Linnie Mae said exactly ZERO about the left hand.

[John Iacoletti]

Some more evidence that only one hand was involved.

[Jack Nessan]

It's not vitriol.  You think your wild speculation is somehow superior to any other wild speculation.  And you thinking couching it in smug, condescending language somehow makes it something other than wild speculation.

Meanwhile, Linnie Mae said exactly ZERO about the left hand.

It's not vitriol.  You think your wild speculation is somehow superior to any other wild speculation.  And you thinking couching it in smug, condescending language somehow makes it something other than wild speculation.
 
Meanwhile, Linnie Mae said exactly ZERO about the left hand.

Are you sure?
This is something you do not see very often. The spider seems to be caught in his own web. Speculating without knowing what you were speculating about.

 Your speculation is she made a mistake and meant to say what it turns out she had already stated. Only you apparently did not know she had.

John’s speculation:

She could have started to say something like "and the bottom was a few inches off the ground", but interrupted herself to say "he carried it this way", demonstrating a right-handed grip near the top of the package.  Either way, she says nothing about the left hand.  It's all in your mind.

Linnie May--”and he carried it in his right hand, had the top sort of folded down and had a grip like this, and the bottom, he carried it this way, you know, and it almost touched the ground as he carried it”


There is just not two ways to interpret this statement. That is probably why you and Capasse cannot explain it away.

Linnie May : "It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand."

It is obviously not convenient that she stated - “and the bottom, he carried it this way” but she did say it and “and the bottom, he carried it this way” does not have a lot of other meanings.

ripped the bag in his right hand near the top. "It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand. It was ... more bulky toward the bottom" than toward the top.

See it does have a top and a bottom. She doesn’t state which hand. How are we to know?

 

[Jack Nessan]

Some more evidence that only one hand was involved.

Some more evidence that only one hand was involved.

 No, it is not. I think this is going downhill for you.

Do you have any idea what a player looks like carrying his bat to home plate?

Whoops, boy this is awkward. You are a stickler for left hand and right hand. There is a specific reference to a RIGHT HANDED Batter. Would not a right handed batter hold the bat in his left hand as he approached the plate. Right hand then placed on top of the left hand when he gets into his stance. Bat pointing forward or up. You think LHO was carrying the rifle sticking straight out or up? That is new. Remember “and the bottom that he carried this way” is almost touching the ground not waving in the air.

Because there is no mention of his left hand. Does this mean he does not have a left hand. The impression is that you do not think he has a left hand.