I see. So your arrogantly expressed, contrived interpretation is automatically superior to any other interpretation, because . . . reasons. Believe whatever you like, but don't call it "logic". She said NOTHING about the left hand, no matter how badly you want it to mean that.
There is nothing about that description that tells you a single thing about how long the package was. And her estimate was 27-28 1/2 inches.
Wow John. Such vitriol. All I did was point out your wild speculation seemingly without full knowledge of Linnie May’s statement and suddenly you become a poster child for everything you don’t like about everyone else’s posting. Maybe it would be better to post Cool Story Bro or LOL.
Here I will post it again and you can take another shot at it. It would be nice to see a better answer.
"My fault for not posting her complete statement on how the bag was being carried as you obviously were unaware of what she had already stated about the top of the package before she focuses on the bottom of it . She had already explained how the top was being carried and then she shifted her explanation to the bottom by stating “and”--- “and the bottom”. So, you are now speculating she now explains again how the top was being held? By using the word “bottom” That actually makes sense to you? John. logic is your specialty don’t let it fail you now."
