Buell Wesley Frazier

[Michael Capasse]

Not true, CE 543 shell was dryfired in LHO's carcano.

CE-543 was a dented shell found in the SN.
Did he dry-fire at the president?

https://jfk.boards.net/post/2754/thread

[Jack Nessan]

Perhaps you should read Newman's 2008 version of Oswald and the CIA (in which he accuses Angleton of being the mastermind), and his 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole -- which he dedicates to my hero, Tennent H. Bagley (look him up) -- in which he says he was wrong to accuse Angleton of being the mastermind. But do by all means disregard the parts where he says Sergei Papushin was a true defector, that Oswald was a Ukrainian (sic) KGB agent in Minsk, and that some evil, evil high-level American military officers killed JFK because he refused to nuke Moscow and Peking in 1963, won't you?

(Once a published tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorist, always a published tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorist, I guess . . .)

I will check out the book. 911 and the back story to that has always been interesting.

The biggest question I have is always, what do these people hope to gain by weaving these tales? It seems accusing these people of wrong doing in a book would be a good way to leave this world suddenly if there was any reality to it.

Some of this sounds like the docuseries the Octopus Murders. In the end no one knows if it was real or not, but the journalist is still dead.

 

[Jack Nessan]

But it was. It's a fact, even if you choose to ignore it.

It was specifically concerning "Oswald's rifle."

You forgot the quote.

By whom?

But it was. It's a fact, even if you choose to ignore it.

People are fascinated by the scope. I am just not one of them.

So were the iron sights there but no one is concerned about them. Without shooting the rifle he easily could have checked to see how far off the scope was. It truly is a poor quality scope. Sighting scopes in is a process they are not automatically accurate when installed. The scope mount used can be easily bent. Coming installed from the factory means nothing. 
 

It was specifically concerning "Oswald's rifle."

Her expertise in rifles consists of what? The same result would have been achieved asking her about the medical information. Marina has no experience with it either to draw on.


You forgot the quote.

Typo
 

By whom?

If not Oswald, who is doing the shooting. It doesn’t change the fact that CE 543 was dryfired and matched to the rifle.

[Tom Sorensen]

But it was. It's a fact, even if you choose to ignore it.

People are fascinated by the scope. I am just not one of them.

The facts still don't care about your opinion.

So were the iron sights there but no one is concerned about them.

Certainly not the WC, for obvious reasons.

Without shooting the rifle he easily could have checked to see how far off the scope was.

That would certainly depend on the condition of the scope; what scenario are you assuming since your sudden interest in the scope?

It truly is a poor quality scope. Sighting scopes in is a process they are not automatically accurate when installed. The scope mount used can be easily bent. Coming installed from the factory means nothing. 

So why bring it to the sixth floor when it wasn't to be trusted?

It was specifically concerning "Oswald's rifle."

Her expertise in rifles consists of what? The same result would have been achieved asking her about the medical information. Marina has no experience with it either to draw on.

So not creditable across the board.

You forgot the quote.

Typo

Good.

By whom?

If not Oswald, who is doing the shooting. It doesn’t change the fact that CE 543 was dryfired and matched to the rifle.

If not Oswald, why bring up CE 543? You make no sense.

[John Iacoletti]

How is it speculation when Marina, Oswald's wife who was present to witness the event, indicates it happened?

Where did you get the silly idea that Marina witnessed Lee practicing shooting a rifle?

[John Iacoletti]

No place is any safer than the person with the firearm. Showing up at a rifle range on foot with a gun in a blanket would have been interesting and they like to sell the ammo. Love Field would have worked better, but both have their advantages, but you pay at a rifle range.

Love Field is an airport.  Who practices rifle shooting at an airport?

Yes- Remember he sat on the porch working the rifle bolt and aiming it.

"Remember" what?  It was dark, Marina was inside and she heard noises.

[Tom Graves]

Why Oswald instead of anyone else. I am a long way from well-read on Oswald but what I have garnered, is he was really an anti-social individual. How would someone like him possibly get information from any high-ranking person? It is hard to imagine someone with his nature being good at securing information. You have read a great deal more on this Russian subject than anyone I know. Does he really seem like a person who would be good at it? Granted this whole Russian defection seems strange but everything about him is strange.  But that does not make him a spy, just odd.

According to John M. Newman's theory in his 2022 book, "Uncovering Popov's Mole," it wasn't Oswald's task to get information in the USSR, but to stimulate interest in himself (by declaring to the KGB's microphones hidden in Richard Snyder's office that he was going to tell them "something of special interest" pertaining to his work as a Marine radar operator) so that its moles could be ostensibly uncovered in the CIA, and to unwittingly do it in such a way that would ensure that the ensuing mole hunt would be in the wrong part of the Agency -- the Soviet Russia Division -- thereby protecting the mole who had sent him, Bruce Leonard Solie in the mole-hunting Office of Security.