Buell Wesley Frazier

[John Iacoletti]

Your quoting Linnie’s second recounting not her first. Her first is a 42 inch bag, that was being held in a manner that would have LHO bent at the hip to be holding a 27 inch bag in the same manner.

 

She never said anything about a 42 inch bag.

[John Iacoletti]

If the rifle stayed fully assembled, a small lunch sized bag could simply and easily be placed over the exposed muzzle end of the barrel to hide it. That solution would have been much simpler and quicker than disassembling and reassembling the rifle. The small lunch sized bag could have been disposed of anywhere in the TSBD and would not have appeared out of place.

If a small lunch bag could have been disposed of anywhere, then so could a two-foot long bag.

[John Iacoletti]

1) In the following video @3:33 Buell Wesley Frazier Under Oath, admits that he hardly paid any attention to the bag and the bag could have been protruding out the front of his body,

"could have been".  LOL.

[John Iacoletti]

Tom Sorenson provided an opinion and nothing else, just background noise.

Simply amazing given that you have no evidence beyond your opinion that there was any rifle in any package.

[John Iacoletti]

Another interesting factoid is another simpleton Dougherty testified that some of the fellows and specifically Shelley saw the bag, but obviously Shelley knew better than to admit that he saw Oswald carry the murder weapon. But poor old Frazier had no choice but to slightly twist and admit what he saw, but the best excuse Frazier could come up with, was to introduce a little white lie.

Your cherry-picking skills are a wonder to witness.  Not unlike rubber-necking at the site of a horrific automobile accident.

[John Iacoletti]

So Michael, you acknowledge that Oswald carried a long package to work, why didn't anyone who saw Oswald in the immediate aftermath see Oswald with the long package?
Because the package was important enough for Oswald to make a special trip to Irving to collect it, so where is it, what happened to it and why would Oswald leave it behind?

I propose a theory that explains it all, hear me out.
Oswald made a special trip to Irving on a Thursday so he could retrieve his rifle, a rifle that was missing form the Paine garage on the Friday afternoon.
Oswald wrapped the rifle in brown paper that came from the Depository so the rifle sack could be easily smuggled into his work and wouldn't be so conspicuous.
Oswald left the paper sack and the rifle on the 6th floor and got the heck out of there as quickly as possible.
See Michael, no mental gymnastics required, a straight forward assassination explains ALL the evidence and also explains ALL of Oswald's actions.

Cool story, bro.

If only you had any evidence whatsoever that it is actually true.

[John Iacoletti]

Sorry old chum the evidence is that Oswald told Frazier that he was going to get "curtain rods" and he accomplished the mission by having "curtain rods" with him the very next day and since "curtain rods" were never found and/or needed then we can know for a certainty that the mission was to retrieve his rifle

LOL.