Buell Wesley Frazier

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 519005 times)

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #399 on: February 23, 2025, 06:00:08 AM »
She also said 28 inches.
Cherry picking conflicting statements isn't conclusive proof of anything.

The conflicting statement is Linnie Mae's description of LHO holding the bag with her revised estimate of a 27-to-28-inch package.

A 27- or 28-inch-long bag will not work to match Linnie Mae’s description of how LHO carried the rifle. The top of the package where she described him holding it with his right hand, would be slightly above the knee to about mid-thigh with him actually holding it lower, and additionally LHO also held the package with his left hand closer to the bottom of the package. The bottom of the package also was described as being barely above the ground. 

To hold the rifle as Linnie Mae described, LHO would have had to have been bent over at the waist as he walked to the vehicle. The same would be true for Buell’s description of the package being held under the armpit. The bag as estimated is simply not long enough to fit Linnie Mae’s description.

Mrs. RANDLE. He was carrying a package in a sort of a heavy brown bag, heavier than a grocery bag it looked to me. It was about, if I might measure, about this long, I suppose, and he carried it in his right hand, had the top sort of folded down and had a grip like this, and the bottom, he carried it this way, you know, and it almost touched the ground as he carried it.

Mr. BALL. I have one question, Mr. Chief Justice.
You used an expression there, that the bag appeared heavy.
Mrs. RANDLE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. You meant that there was some weight appeared to--
Mrs. RANDLE. To the bottom.
Mr. BALL. To the bottom?
Mrs. RANDLE. Yes. It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand. It was more bulky toward the bottom than it was this way.
Mr. BELIN. Toward the top? More bulky toward the bottom than toward the top?
Mrs. RANDLE. That is right.


 

 

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #400 on: February 23, 2025, 08:38:43 AM »
At least!

And yet STILL no one can say!

How about you, Tom?

Oodles and gobs, right?

Say what?

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #401 on: February 23, 2025, 08:46:58 AM »
Say what?

Is English your second language?

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #402 on: February 23, 2025, 09:47:11 AM »
Is English your second language?

Correct. You needed something from me?

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #403 on: February 23, 2025, 09:53:52 AM »
Correct. You needed something from me?

Yes -- I could use a good laugh!

Regarding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963, how many bad guys do you think were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the cover up?

Lots and lots?

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #404 on: February 23, 2025, 11:44:47 AM »
Yes -- I could use a good laugh!

Regarding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963, how many bad guys do you think were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the cover up?

Lots and lots?

The Warren report itself, consisting of 888 pages of lies and deception, is the best evidence of a cover-up pinning the murder on Oswald. If Oswald acted alone all along, there would be no need for a cover-up, so we know a conspiracy at some level was real. This is basic stuff.

Seven WC members signed off on the report, plus assistant counsel to the commissions, who were instrumental in putting together the report. LBJ formed the commission to block out any other investigation (he saw Hoover was in panic mode), so I'd say easily 20 in the government cover-up department.

I don't know about the planning and patsy part of the deal. What I can say is that both Frazier and Oswald were planted at the TSBD, as Truly didn't need staff at the time they were hired. I couldn't say if Truly was simply told by management to hire them or if he was part of the setup; Shelley would evidently have known that hiring the two rookies was nuts. At least somebody at this level connected to the TSBD was pulling strings to place Frazier and Oswald there.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #405 on: February 23, 2025, 07:30:10 PM »
The Warren report itself, consisting of 888 pages of lies and deception, is the best evidence of a cover-up pinning the murder on Oswald. If Oswald acted alone all along, there would be no need for a cover-up, so we know a conspiracy at some level was real. This is basic stuff.

Seven WC members signed off on the report, plus assistant counsel to the commissions, who were instrumental in putting together the report. LBJ formed the commission to block out any other investigation (he saw Hoover was in panic mode), so I'd say easily 20 in the government cover-up department.

I don't know about the planning and patsy part of the deal. What I can say is that both Frazier and Oswald were planted at the TSBD, as Truly didn't need staff at the time they were hired. I couldn't say if Truly was simply told by management to hire them or if he was part of the setup; Shelley would evidently have known that hiring the two rookies was nuts. At least somebody at this level connected to the TSBD was pulling strings to place Frazier and Oswald there.

It sounds as though you've been fully indoctrinated.