Buell Wesley Frazier

[Martin Weidmann]

Another non-answer...

to a non-question, perhaps?

But be happy, at least now there can't be any misunderstanding about you being an LN.

It might even have convinced yourself to such an extend that you will never confuse yourself with being a CT again.

[Bill Chapman]

to a non-question, perhaps?

But be happy, at least now there can't be any misunderstanding about you being an LN.

It might even have convinced yourself to such an extend that you will never confuse yourself with being a CT again.

On October 16 I explained the CT typo as a late night slip-of-the-tongue and you said you figured that's what it was.

Now you are foolishly attempting to save face.

[Martin Weidmann]

On October 16 I explained the CT typo as a late night slip-of-the-tongue and you said you figured that's what it was.

Now you are foolishly attempting to save face.

On October 16 I explained the CT typo as a late night slip-of-the-tongue and you said you figured that's what it was.


Yes, you did explain that, but only one day after I had asked you;

myself and other CTers

You are a CTer now?

and after you went back to your original post and changed the wording from CT to LN, and never said a word.

You only "explained" the obvious after your dishonest behavior had been caught out.

Btw the Original CT post can still be seen, as it was quoted in my reply (#296 on page 30 of this thread)!


Now you are foolishly attempting to save face.

Looking in the mirror, are you?

You really are living in a world of your own, aren't you?

[Michael O'Brian]

B.W.F back then was a redneck KKK hillbilly thick unread and in his in his own words and unwordly soul, who was easily manipulated by elders, he lied through his racist Texas teeth. No doubts about it

[Bill Chapman]

On October 16 I explained the CT typo as a late night slip-of-the-tongue and you said you figured that's what it was.

Yes, you did explain that, but only one day after I had asked you; and after you went back to your original post and changed the wording from CT to LN, and never said a word'
>>> Every veteran here knows full well that I'm an LNer. Why wait to inform newbies? And pretty sure I don't need anyone's permission on when to correct my own typos.

You only "explained" the obvious after your dishonest behavior had been caught out.
>>> How is correcting my own typo 'dishonest'?

'Btw the Original CT post can still be seen, as it was quoted in my reply (#296 on page 30 of this thread)!'
>>> Exactly, no need for me to announce anything.

You really are living in a world of your own, aren't you?
>>> Did you figure my CT typo a late night slip of the tongue or didn't you? You did... yet you said in a recent post that "It might even have convinced yourself to such an extend that you will never confuse yourself with being a CT again".

You seem the dishonest party here.

[Martin Weidmann]

Yes, you did explain that, but only one day after I had asked you; and after you went back to your original post and changed the wording from CT to LN, and never said a word'
>>> Every veteran here knows full well that I'm an LNer. Why wait to inform newbies? And pretty sure I don't need anyone's permission on when to correct my own typos.

You only "explained" the obvious after your dishonest behavior had been caught out.
>>> How is correcting my own typo 'dishonest'?

'Btw the Original CT post can still be seen, as it was quoted in my reply (#296 on page 30 of this thread)!'
>>> Exactly, no need for me to announce anything.

You really are living in a world of your own, aren't you?
>>> Did you figure my CT typo a late night slip of the tongue or didn't you? You did... yet you said in a recent post that "It might even have convinced yourself to such an extend that you will never confuse yourself with being a CT again".

You seem the dishonest party here.

Again you show yourself to be a true LN. You just can't let go, can you now?

[John Mytton]

On October 16 I explained the CT typo as a late night slip-of-the-tongue and you said you figured that's what it was.


Yes, you did explain that, but only one day after I had asked you;

and after you went back to your original post and changed the wording from CT to LN, and never said a word.

You only "explained" the obvious after your dishonest behavior had been caught out.

Btw the Original CT post can still be seen, as it was quoted in my reply (#296 on page 30 of this thread)!


Now you are foolishly attempting to save face.

Looking in the mirror, are you?

You really are living in a world of your own, aren't you?

Wow, why all these attacks on the LNers, it's not a war, we are simply having a debate about the evidence in the JFK case but it seems that since you can't support your JFK arguments you're reduced to these endless and entirely worthless ad-hom attacks.
Maybe you need to take a break Weidmann and spend some time to analyse what's motivating you and then see a shrink and try and get rid of it!

JohnM