But this is what the Trine Day and Skyhorse publishing houses do. And use each others’ books as sources. Illegal !
“False in part, false in whole”
Conspiracy author "A" cites conspiracy author "B" for a claim. "B" cites conspiracy author "C" for
his, i.e., "B's", claim.
When challenged, conspiracy author "A" says he has two sources for
his claim: source "B" and source "C". But he only has one, "C", and not two. And neither "A" or "B" check if the claim by "C" is accurate.
Multiply this by 60+ years and hundreds of conspiracy books and it's no wonder that people believe conspiracy nonsense.
Meanwhile, Fred Litwin repeatedly cites
primary sources. He goes around the world finding them. He doesn't cite lone assassin books. He has the original documents. And the conspiracy crowd (not all but the most vocal) responds with temper tantrums and calls him names and wants him banned.