The Sibert and O'Neill report was not flawed but accurately presented the pathologists' findings by the end of the exam phase of the autopsy, and we know from multiple sources that the no-back-wound-exit finding did not change for at least the first two versions of the autopsy report.
The Sibert and O'Neill report is seriously flawed. It does not accurately represent the findings of the autopsy pathologists. We do not know from multiple credible sources that a no-back-wound-exit finding did not change for at least the first two versions of the autopsy report. There were no two first two versions of the autopsy report. There is the one and only autopsy report. It is not the third autopsy report. It is the only autopsy report that has ever existed on the autopsy of the body of President Kennedy done on Nov 22, 1963. The supplemental autopsy on the brain was done several days later.
We also know from Boswell himself and from Ebersole, among others, that the autopsy doctors knew about the throat wound long before the autopsy ended, which belies Humes's tale that he didn't learn of the throat wound until the following day.
The pathologists no doubt had a pretty good idea by the end of the autopsy that the wound in the throat was a bullet exit wound. But Humes needed it confirmed. That's why he phoned Dr. Perry.
We also know from multiple sources that the men around the autopsy table could see the end of the probe pushing up against the lining of the chest cavity, and that this was after the initial probing and after the chest organs had been removed.
Do we? Who were those multiple witnesses, and when did they testify under oath that they could see the end of the probe pushing up against the lining of the chest cavity?
Are you ever going to get around to addressing the main points of the OP, (1) the marked disparity between the FBI's shooting scenario and the WC's shooting scenario, and (2) the drastic contradiction between the FBI's locations for the limo for each shot and the extant Zapruder film?
The OP is flawed. The FBI's shooting scenario, as published in their 1/13/1964 report, was based on the seriously flawed Nov 26/63 FD-302 report of Sibert and O'Neill. The FBI had not read the actual autopsy report. Nor had they interviewed the autopsy pathologists.
Umm, the main problem with Manning's statement is that he said he found a Hidell ID card in Oswald's wallet when he interviewed him on Friday night, but Oswald's wallet had already been confiscated hours before Manning interviewed him, as Officer Bentley and Detective Sims confirmed.
The wallet had been removed from Oswald's possession by Bentley. Manning was afforded access to that wallet by the DPD. Oswald was being interviewed in the offices of the DPD. Manning was present during that interview. Oswald was asked by his interrogator about his possession of that Selective Service card. So, obviously, his wallet was there during that interview. When the interview was over, Manning examined the contents of the wallet.
Topic: CD 298 and CD 107: Overlooked Evidence (Read 175 times)