New: "Faulty Evidence: Problems with the Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald"

[Jack Nessan]

The FBI took an imprint from Oswald's rifle from the exact same location that Day on the day, took the palmprint impression from Oswald's rifle and the FBI confirmed beyond all doubt that Oswald palmprint was in contact with Oswald's rifle!!!

The palmprint that Day took on the 22nd.



The print that the FBI took directly from Oswald's rifle.



The random marks from Day's print is a perfect match to the prints taken from Oswald's rifle by the FBI.



And besides the above Incredibly Powerful Indisputable Evidence, Vincent Scalice with high resolution photos taken with multiple exposures of Oswald's rifle proved again beyond all doubt that Oswald's prints were on the Trigger Guard of Oswald's rifle!!!

JohnM

Great graphics John

Real evidence frightens Griffith. That is why he never posts anything but hearsay, maybe's and what if's from half-baked pseudo experts. The rifle was LHO's, no doubts.

[John Mytton]

Great graphics John

Real evidence frightens Griffith. That is why he never posts anything but hearsay, maybe's and what if's from half-baked pseudo experts. The rifle was LHO's, no doubts.

...and what if's from half-baked pseudo experts.

This is classic Griffith, it doesn't matter how many genuine specialized experts agree, Griffith will dig up some "expert" who is totally unqualified in a particular field and somehow this "expert" will endorse Griffith's MASSIVE conspiracy!
Here's some examples from Griffith and/or his hardcore conspiracist friends.

Like a mathematician with a PHD who sees Zapruder fakery.
Like a Hollywood Colorist who sees "impossibilities" in the Backyard photos
Like professional Film Editors who see a painted in black patch in logarithmically manipulated multi generational Zapruder frames.
Like X-ray technicians commenting on forensic science.
Like a Podiatrist who has an opinion on forensic ballistics and head wound analysis.
The list is almost never-ending...

JohnM