Author Topic: Darnell Gifs "Credit: 6th Floor Museum" Jones Collection NBC 5 Archive  (Read 492 times)

0 Members are viewing this topic.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 375
The clique protects Prayer Man and corrupts JFK research...

Even Morley is afraid to elaborate...

Not one word about obtaining and scanning the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy...Instead we get Larry Schnapf pandering to the Prayer Man people and explaining why the Task Force is never going to try to get the 6th Floor copy...That is a direct serving of the Prayer Man groups' (Greg Parker) corruption of JFK research...The reason there is no discussion of the 6th Floor Museum Jones copy showing Sarah Stanton's dress neckline is because the hijacking clique on The Education Forum is completely aware that it proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The Luna Task Force could obtain the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy any time it desired only the Prayer Man people have reached their slimy octopus arm of corruption all they way to Congress via DiEugenio...Ask Andrew Iler how he defines that via the site rules...It isn't what you know it is who you know via the buddy buddy system that fraudulent forum operates under...

How honest is it for Mr Unger to bring the film that finally settled the Prayer Man issue to The Education Forum and not discuss or show its most important aspect?...

The reason there is no participation in Robin's thread over there on the EF is because they know it shows Stanton's dress neckline and they are intentionally de-populating the subject in order to avoid the Prayer Man head-hunters...
« Last Edit: Today at 07:08:44 PM by Brian Doyle »

Online Robin Unger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Sarah Stanton.


Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 375

Those same FBI interview statements as Robin shows here were what was shown to Carolyn Arnold who, upon seeing what FBI quoted her as saying, emphatically rejected it and told Earl Golz that FBI had altered her statement...We have to assume that if Sarah Stanton was speaking up at family gatherings, and repeating her witnessing of Oswald on the 2nd Floor staircase landing, that FBI committed another alteration in the case of Stanton's statement just like they did with Carolyn Arnold and many other witnesses...Sarah Stanton was very lucky to be alive considering what other witnesses were murdered for...No one ever went to Stanton and showed her her FBI statement like Golz did with Carolyn Arnold...But you can be sure that what drove Stanton to repeat her witnessing at family gatherings was her consternation over her witnessing never surfacing in coverage of the assassination...

If one were to accurately translate what Stanton said in this statement (instead of the distorted garbage Bart Kamp has flooded the internet with) you can see she told FBI in this statement that she was up behind Lovelady in the Prayer Man position...She confirmed this when she said she could not see the limousine at the time of the shots...If you look at Darnell, Prayer Man cannot see the limo at the time of the shots due to the west wall of the portal...The 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy finally confirmed this by showing Stanton's dress neckline on Prayer Man...In 2016 Chris Davidson's enhancement of the clear Wiegman frame also proved Prayer Man was Stanton...Davidson admitted he was friends with the Prayer Man people so he never supported his discovery...Stanton is faintly seen up behind Lovelady in Hughes...No effort was ever made to obtain and scan Hughes because the Prayer Man people knew what they would find...

Discussion of this evidence squarely belongs on The Education Forum according to its merit...It is being kept off the forum by a group of insiders who dominate the forum and control the administrator, moderators, and members...These people disallow discussion of the evidence that disproves Prayer Man by means of banning and defamation of those who can prove it - as well as false claims of rules violations...My discovery of Stanton's witnessing of Oswald waiting for Mrs Reid to clear out the Lunch Room is one of the most important discoveries in conspiracy research yet it is purposely kept from The Education Forum where it belongs without accountability by those who are censoring it...
« Last Edit: Today at 07:42:31 PM by Brian Doyle »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2227
Those same FBI interview statements as Robin shows here were what was shown to Carolyn Arnold who, upon seeing what FBI quoted her as saying, emphatically rejected it and told Earl Golz that FBI had altered her statement...We have to assume that if Sarah Stanton was speaking up at family gatherings, and repeating her witnessing of Oswald on the 2nd Floor staircase landing, that FBI committed another alteration in the case of Stanton's statement just like they did with Carolyn Arnold and many other witnesses...Sarah Stanton was very lucky to be alive considering what other witnesses were murdered for...No one ever went to Stanton and showed her her FBI statement like Golz did with Carolyn Arnold...But you can be sure that what drove Stanton to repeat her witnessing at family gatherings was her consternation over her witnessing never surfacing in coverage of the assassination...

The same year that Carolyn Arnold told Earl Golz that she saw Oswald in the 2nd floor lunchroom on her way out of the building at 12:25, she told Anthony Summers that she saw Oswald in the 2nd floor lunchroom at about 12:15. 19 years later she told Johnny Young that she was positive that she saw him in the 1st floor lunchroom before she exited the building. Carolyn Arnold was not credible.

Neither Carolyn Arnold's statement to the FBI or Sarah Stanton's statement to them were altered. Sarah Stanton did not see Oswald at any time on Nov 22, 1963.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 375


Every time I debate this I post that the decider was Carolyn Arnold's March 1964 statement that she was allowed to proofread...That statement clearly indicated a 12:25 time for her witnessing...When this is combined with Sarah Stanton's witnessing of Oswald out on the 2nd Floor staircase landing it confirms Carolyn Arnold's 12:25 time in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...Oswald had told Stanton he was going back in to the Break Room and not going down to watch the motorcade...That Break Room was the 2nd Floor Lunch Room Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald eating lunch alone in at 12:25...It is the same Lunch Room, as Hosty admitted to Nigel Turner, that Oswald said he was alone in during the assassination...

Every time I post this conclusive proof you ignore it and return with the same regressive entries...

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2227

Every time I debate this I post that the decider was Carolyn Arnold's March 1964 statement that she was allowed to proofread...That statement clearly indicated a 12:25 time for her witnessing...When this is combined with Sarah Stanton's witnessing of Oswald out on the 2nd Floor staircase landing it confirms Carolyn Arnold's 12:25 time in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...Oswald had told Stanton he was going back in to the Break Room and not going down to watch the motorcade...That Break Room was the 2nd Floor Lunch Room Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald eating lunch alone in at 12:25...It is the same Lunch Room, as Hosty admitted to Nigel Turner, that Oswald said he was alone in during the assassination...

Every time I post this conclusive proof you ignore it and return with the same regressive entries...

Carolyn Arnold's statement of March 64 does not supercede her statement made to the FBI on Nov 26, 1963. She made two different statements in 1978 and then another vastly different one in 1997. Sarah Stanton's signed statement of March 18, 1964 was witnessed by two FBI agents. In that statement, she was repeating what she told Agents Pinkston and  Carlson on Nov 23, 1963. She did not see Oswald at all on Nov 22, 1963. Those early statements of hers take precedence over something that members of her family may have concurred up 50 years after the fact.



https://www.maryferrell.org/xdoc/10408#relPageId=24