Ruby Shouts Out Oswald's Affiliation With Fair Play At Press Conference

[Bill Brown]

OK Mr Brown...

We'll have to accept your version that Ruby was there to bring the busy police officers cold cut sandwiches...

The Dallas Police knew Oswald was CIA...They had run ins with him before where they knew his affiliation...


Mr Brown:  Was Ruby there at the Press Conference when Oswald was there?

And if he was does that make your weak gotcha point meaningless?...

Could Ruby have looked Oswald in the eye then?...


(Under Iler and Simkin Brown has full access to The Education Forum)...
 

Now you're creating a straw man argument.  Who said anything about cold cuts?

The bottom line is that it is foolish to claim that Ruby corrected Wade as to the name of the organization so that he "could look Oswald in the eye".  It is foolish because Oswald was not present.  I see you skipped right over that point.

I'm not trying to be rude to you, as you've never been rude to me.  I'm just correcting your falsehood; one which you should have already been aware of before making such a thread.

[Brian Doyle]

He says while skipping right over the point...

Ruby was there to look Oswald in the eye and make sure he knew to stay in pro-Castro, Fair Play For Cuba sympathizer mode (which Oswald did)...

Ruby proved his true role 2 days later in the Police Station basement...

Please feel free to enter any further self-exposing weak responses...

I'm just correcting your falsehood; one which you should have already been aware of before making such a thread.

Mr Brown:

Since you are so strident on factual errors please show me where you insisted on strict correction of the Prayer Man theory over on The Education Forum...

[Bill Brown]

He says while skipping right over the point...

Ruby was there to look Oswald in the eye and make sure he knew to stay in pro-Castro, Fair Play For Cuba sympathizer mode (which Oswald did)...

Ruby proved his true role 2 days later in the Police Station basement...

Please feel free to enter any further self-exposing weak responses...



Mr Brown:

Since you are so strident on factual errors please show me where you insisted on strict correction of the Prayer Man theory over on The Education Forum...

I don't engage in the prayer man nonsense.

Reporter: "Were you in the building at the time?"

Oswald: "Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir."

Oswald is telling us he was inside the building "at the time".  If he was inside the building at the time, then he was not out front on the landing.  If he was not out front on the landing, then he is not prayer man.  If he is not prayer man, then who cares who prayer man is.

[Mark A. Oblazney]

now you be nice to mssr. Brown, Albert, he’s the only pal you got, don’t get all uppity, huh?

[John Corbett]

Corbett is a typical Lone Nutter denier and his excuse-making reference doesn't do anything close to disproving the claim...

I don't need to disprove anything. The people making the claim have the burden of proof.

The deniers who made that excuse-making article don't list where Ruby was and what he was doing that exposed him to the broadcasts of Oswald's sheep-dipped membership in Fair Play For Cuba - which just about everyone on the planet knows was an Intel attempt to paint Oswald as a sincere Castro supporter...Truth is, if you trace Ruby's doings that Friday he was too busy trying to monitor Oswald for the conspiratorial underground to be watching TV...Being part of the conspiracy, Ruby knee-jerked "Fair Play For Cuba" because he knew the danger of Oswald being seen as the real anti-Castro false flag provocateur he was...Like many in the conspiracy, he was anxious to keep the set-up in order and on script...The same guy who was seen in photos with Richard Nixon knew he was connected all the way to the top with high powered politics...


The Dallas Police all knew Oswald was CIA...It is part of the reason why Oswald was handled in the overtly corrupted manner he was at the Police Station...As a matter of fact, Wade's reference to the Free Cuba Committee was probably a Freudian Slip because he knew CIA Oswald was on the side of the anti-Castro people being an agent provocateur...Oswald had already presented himself that way to Bringuier...We know Ruby got caught there because Ruby himself never explained where he heard it...

The regulars on this forum all know you are nuts. You choose to believe things for which there is zero evidence.

[Brian Doyle]

I don't engage in the prayer man nonsense.

Reporter: "Were you in the building sat the time?"

Oswald: "Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir."

Oswald is telling us he was inside the building "at the time".  If he was inside the building at the time, then he was not out front on the landing.  If he was not out front on the landing, then he is not prayer man.  If he is not prayer man, then who cares who prayer man is.

You don't get to choose which evidence you recognize and which you don't...

The need to debunk the Greg Parker Prayer Man theory led me to the most important evidence discovery of our generation in the form of Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he wasn't going down to the front steps to watch the motorcade but was going back in to the 2nd Floor Break Room instead to eat his lunch...

The Education Forum also chooses which evidence it recognizes and which it doesn't and it uses vicious censorship and persecution (and lies about site rules violations) to keep this very important information from the awareness of the research community all so it can pamper Jim DiEugenio and run things the way he likes - which involves censoring people who out-argue him...All so it can maintain the clique...

Simkin and Iler remain on the safe side of accounting for this by the means of uncredible ignoring, banning, and censorship...So while you pose yourself as a strict maintainer of accuracy you offer flimsy excuses when it comes to keeping the clique honest...The members of The Education Forum sell other researchers out cheaply as long as they get a guaranteed seat at the forum...They are responsible for the lack of progress in solving the case...

[Brian Doyle]

I don't need to disprove anything. The people making the claim have the burden of proof.
The regulars on this forum all know you are nuts. You choose to believe things for which there is zero evidence.

It is pretty obvious that the reason Ruby corrected Wade was because of the need to prevent Oswald from being known for what he really was, an anti-Castro agent provocateur...I imagine Wade made a Freudian Slip when he said Oswald was a member of the anti-Castro Free Cuba Movement...Wade knew Oswald was CIA and was playing the role of pro-Castro agitator...