Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Andrew Iler Cannot Clean Up Education Forum  (Read 603 times)

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Andrew Iler Cannot Clean Up Education Forum
« Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 03:33:21 PM »
Sure it can! We can just ignore you, as everybody else seems to do.


You are ignoring the evidence...

You can't ignore important evidence and still claim credibility...
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 03:34:34 PM by Brian Doyle »

Online Brian Doyle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Andrew Iler Cannot Clean Up Education Forum
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 03:40:13 PM »


Most participants on the JFK internet are organized around avoiding the evidence for conspiracy and not exposing it...

Online Mark A. Oblazney

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
Re: Andrew Iler Cannot Clean Up Education Forum
« Reply #23 on: Yesterday at 03:55:36 PM »
“From now on, Doyle, Griffin, Cole and everybody else is BANNED from the other forum AND the White House press conferences”
     ———————— me me me me me me me, the great hoax buster, buster
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 03:57:07 PM by Mark A. Oblazney »

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
Re: Andrew Iler Cannot Clean Up Education Forum
« Reply #24 on: Yesterday at 05:29:14 PM »
"These people who say that we ought to withdraw from Vietnam are wholly wrong because if we withdrew from Vietnam the communists would control Vietnam. Pretty soon Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Malaya would go and all of southeast Asia would be under the control of the communists. Another domination of the Chinese. Then India, Burma would be the next target. So I think we should stay." --- JFK to Walter Cronkite, September 2, 1963.

Again: "So I think we should stay."

Was JFK lying to the American people about this? Was he going to run on a promise - and need - of staying and then after re-election withdraw? If so then the JFK conspiracists are describing one of most duplicitous people ever to be President (up to that point). They don't even seem to realize it.

From what I've read, JFK didn't want to send combat/infantry troops to Vietnam; in fact, he was adamantly against it. But he also didn't want to see it fall to the communists. As he said above, it would affect all of southeast Asia. But not intending to send troops is not the same as intending to withdraw. Again, as he said above, those advocating withdrawal were "wholly wrong." Not a little wrong, or a lot wrong; but wholly wrong.

Go to the 14:30 mark to hear the above:

« Last Edit: Today at 12:41:58 AM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Andrew Iler Cannot Clean Up Education Forum
« Reply #25 on: Today at 02:41:42 AM »
SMG--

Thanks for posting. BTW, there are clips of RFK in 1967 backing US actions in SV, which by them were much enlarged.

JFK was an ardent and global anti-communist. So was RFK.

The idea that some group would assassinate JFK for his unclear plans on Vietnam in 1963 is very weak. LBJ was also unclear on what to do in 1964.

There was a great deal of animosity in the Cuban exile crowd towards JFK, and, of course, Castro had been the target of multiple assassinations attempts during the JFK years.

President LBJ put the kibosh on following any leads from LHO back to Havana or Moscow.