How Do LNers Deal With Givens?

[Dan O'meara]

I listed specific items your narrative doesn't even begin to explain, and your one sentence reply provides no details on how your imagined conspirators accomplished the other items. The sad part is that you're not bright enough to understand that.

That's right.
After I had neatly dealt with your challenge you started panicking and throwing in a load more items that weren't in the original challenge.
Now, getting back to the topic of this thread.
You've been challenged by me. It's a far more simple challenge.
You've pretended not to notice it because you're a bit devious like that.
I faced your challenge head on -  do you have the character and backbone to face mine?

Remember - your answer must be Common Sense, it must be Rational.

[Tim Nickerson]

I'm really surprised at you, Tim, for posting such utter nonsense.
Finding Oswald's rifle on the 6th floor DOES NOT place Oswald at the SN window at 12:30
Because Oswald had no alibi at the time of the shooting DOES NOT place him at the SN window at 12:30
Finding Oswald's prints on boxes in the SN DOES NOT place at the SN window at 12:30

There is no piece of evidence - NONE - that places Oswald at the SN window at 12:30
Your interpretation of these select pieces of evidence is that Oswald was the shooter - that's your interpretation of these particular pieces of evidence.
And your assumption is that if Oswald was the shooter, then he was at the SN window at 12:30pm.
It's a theory, Tim, and nothing more.
You never struck me as a true Nutter, in the mould of Corbett or Smith, but it appears you may well be.

I haven't been posting nonsense here. You have.

Oswald's rifle being the assassination weapon, together with the fact that he had no alibi for the time of the shooting, places him in the SN at 12:30pm.

[John Corbett]

That's right.
After I had neatly dealt with your challenge you started panicking and throwing in a load more items that weren't in the original challenge.
Now, getting back to the topic of this thread.
You've been challenged by me. It's a far more simple challenge.
You've pretended not to notice it because you're a bit devious like that.
I faced your challenge head on -  do you have the character and backbone to face mine?

Remember - your answer must be Common Sense, it must be Rational.

I doubt you and Common Sense have ever crossed paths.

[Dan O'meara]

I doubt you and Common Sense have ever crossed paths.

I didn't think for a second you had the backbone to engage in any kind of genuine debate.
And you are right to run along, it wasn't going to work out well for you.

[John Corbett]

I didn't think for a second you had the backbone to engage in any kind of genuine debate.
And you are right to run along, it wasn't going to work out well for you.

 “Never argue with an idiot; they will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

I must credit the late, great George Carlin for that line.