The JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate

How Do LNers Deal With Givens?

<< < (8/21) > >>

Tim Nickerson:

--- Quote from: John Corbett on September 07, 2026, 03:53:31 AM ---You can slice it any way you want, the fact is the bullet did not enter the back of JFK's neck and Ford opened up a can of worms by suggesting it be described that way. That's simply wrong.

--- End quote ---

I sliced it the way that I sliced it. Please read it again. Ford did not change the location of the entry wound. He did not move it by as much as a mm in any direction. He recommended a change in the wording of the draft report. He did not unilaterally change that wording. His recommendation was valid. Humes et al said that the wound was in the low neck. I'm not interested in defending Ford. I didn't particularly care for him. My interest is for historical accuracy. Your issue is with Humes et al. You may be right. The bullet may not have entered the back of the neck. I usually argue that it did but I don't need it to have. The bullet traversed downward through Kennedy and exited his throat. It honestly makes no difference to me if it entered at the level of C7 or T1. 

Michael Capasse:

--- Quote from: Zeon Mason on September 06, 2026, 11:11:33 PM ---The back of the NECK?  Does any JFK autopsy photo show an entrance wound on the back of JFKs NECK?
If so, please post that photo.

--- End quote ---

That bullet went on one wild ride. Pat yourself on the back, seriously, that is bone/plate.
Look at the autopsy picture with the ruler - that wound is not in the neck.

CE-399 would have to go thru skin at the side of the esophagus/throat  to continue on and do all the damage it did.
It has to go thru the neck without hitting any bone or cartilage to maintain the speed. The so called "exit wound" looks centered in front.

John Mytton:

--- Quote from: John Corbett on September 07, 2026, 03:53:31 AM ---You can slice it any way you want, the fact is the bullet did not enter the back of JFK's neck and Ford opened up a can of worms by suggesting it be described that way. That's simply wrong.

--- End quote ---

All Ford did was clarify and more accurately reflect the same description that was used in the autopsy report.

Autopsy report


Ford's correction


JohnM

John Mytton:

https://www.drstephaniebarrett.com/2017/01/17/how-can-i-help-my-neck-pain/


http://riversidespineandphysmed.com/neck-pain/


http://www.qmagnets.com/neckshoulder.php


http://shreenidhiphysio.com/physio/treatment/



JohnM

Zeon Mason:
I think maybe it would be more accurate to say the BASE of the neck. It still looks lower than that to me but I’m just a layman :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version