You just can't actually prove it, right?
Nice to see you Tim. It's been some time.
Hi Martin, thank you for the kind words.
The SBT is based on the evidence. I could present it to you but I know that you would never accept it as proof that the SBT should really be known as the Single Bullet Fact. When the SBT comes up in discussions on the assassination here and elsewhere it is usually brought up by CTs who refer to it as the Magic Bullet Theory. We're told by them that the wound in Kennedy's back, or back of the neck, does not line up with the wound in the throat from a shot fired from the Southeast window of the 6th floor of the TSBD; the entry wound being too low. We're told that Connally was not seated low enough for the bullet to hit him where it did. We're told that Connally wasn't far enough inboard of Kennedy for the bullet to have hit him where it did. We're told that the bullet could not have created all of the wounds that the SBT proposes it did and end up in the condition it did. My take is that you guys are wrong on all accounts. A strong case against the SBT does not exist.
