The Education Forum is employing the trick of using the better writers, authors, and researchers to impose a sort of literary snobbery which is then used to censor some of the better evidence analysts and maintain the clique...This creates a sort of infallibility for researchers like Jim DiEugenio who know exactly what they are doing over there while pretending to be good guy researchers...
If you want to test how true it is simply go to the forum and post a post asking for a review of how they handled the Prayer Man theory...The way it was handled was every time someone tried to make progress on the evidence that Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton James Gordon would swoop in and change the subject and shut the thread down before any evidence could be argued...Then Sandy Larsen would take over with his Prayer Man is Oswald propaganda...They did that under the premise that the thread always caused a problem without honestly admitting that they were the problem...Prayer Man is best argued when those who can refute it are censored and banned with the people who banned them now making up the rules...Simkin then lies and says he trusts his moderators...