Here's Someone Everyone Should Listen To: Dr. James Carrico

[Steve Barber]

You're not answering what was written...

The Blood Splatter is exactly where it would be if there was a shot from the front and Occipital exit wound...

There is zero where Carrico's wound needs it to be...

That's why they do blood splatter analysis because it is forensically accurate...

Pitzer proved the was a covert pre-autopsy to alter the wounds...

 I did address what you wrote with further proof of the total absurdity of your claim that the blood on the backrest of the back seat is "proof" of a frontal shot! That blood on the backseat had to have gotten onto that area while JFK was being removed from the car, due to what I pointed out to you regarding Mrs. Kennedy's lower body pressing against that portion of the seat, as seen in the Zapruder film. 

 You just don't like what I pointed out to you.

And as for the photo of the car's backset, it wasn't taken at Parkland.  There are zero photos of the back seat of the car while at Parkland
 
The photos of the back seat were taken in Washington D.C. at the White House garage after the car was returned to Washington and before FBI agent Robert Frazier and a 2nd person sifted through and examined the entire limousine for evidence. It's all available in the testimony of Robert Frazier.

 And as for your calling Dr. Carrico a liar for saying "the side of the head was avulsed", Carrico was correct!

What do you think that mass is above and to the front of JFK's ear, covering the temple and extending forward is?  That is a portion of the side and top-side of JFK's head attached to scalp and hanging inside-out/upside down, which Mrs. Kennedy put back into place on the way to Parkland. Did you even read what I posted yesterday, that she told Theodore White?  And upon her putting that huge piece of skull back up and into place, she distorted the view of the head wound, inadvertently.  What Dr. Carrico saw is what the top of the head photos show after the skull had been put back into plaza by Mrs. Kennedy when they arrived at the hospital. Most people can see the avulsed area on the right top of the head wound, where the skull bone is clearly visible.   

 

[Brian Doyle]

I stand corrected on the location of the limousine in the blood splatter photo...

You try to get away with ignoring Hargis who witnessed the strong gunshot splatter in the same rearward, Occipital direction evidenced by the splatter in the aforementioned photo...

Clint Hill also looked in to the tunnel-like wound that he said was in the back of the head until he adjusted his story just like Carrico did...Hill saw a plug of brain, skull, and flesh in the back seat, that had obviously dropped out of that gaping wound and fallen in the back seat...That plug of gore matched the rear-exiting blood splatter pattern...

The Bell Film caught some rear-exiting flesh...

[Royell Storing]

 I did address what you wrote with further proof of the total absurdity of your claim that the blood on the backrest of the back seat is "proof" of a frontal shot! That blood on the backseat had to have gotten onto that area while JFK was being removed from the car, due to what I pointed out to you regarding Mrs. Kennedy's lower body pressing against that portion of the seat, as seen in the Zapruder film. 

 You just don't like what I pointed out to you.

And as for the photo of the car's backset, it wasn't taken at Parkland.  There are zero photos of the back seat of the car while at Parkland
 
The photos of the back seat were taken in Washington D.C. at the White House garage after the car was returned to Washington and before FBI agent Robert Frazier and a 2nd person sifted through and examined the entire limousine for evidence. It's all available in the testimony of Robert Frazier.

 And as for your calling Dr. Carrico a liar for saying "the side of the head was avulsed", Carrico was correct!

What do you think that mass is above and to the front of JFK's ear, covering the temple and extending forward is?  That is a portion of the side and top-side of JFK's head attached to scalp and hanging inside-out/upside down, which Mrs. Kennedy put back into place on the way to Parkland. Did you even read what I posted yesterday, that she told Theodore White?  And upon her putting that huge piece of skull back up and into place, she distorted the view of the head wound, inadvertently.  What Dr. Carrico saw is what the top of the head photos show after the skull had been put back into plaza by Mrs. Kennedy when they arrived at the hospital. Most people can see the avulsed area on the right top of the head wound, where the skull bone is clearly visible.   

 

    As you posted, Jackie said "TOP of his head". Not the "side" or the "upper side" or the "top side", but TOP.  That Flap is not the TOP of the head.

[Steve Barber]

I stand corrected on the location of the limousine in the blood splatter photo...

You try to get away with ignoring Hargis who witnessed the strong gunshot splatter in the same rearward, Occipital direction evidenced by the splatter in the aforementioned photo...

Clint Hill also looked in to the tunnel-like wound that he said was in the back of the head until he adjusted his story just like Carrico did...Hill saw a plug of brain, skull, and flesh in the back seat, that had obviously dropped out of that gaping wound and fallen in the back seat...That plug of gore matched the rear-exiting blood splatter pattern...

The Bell Film caught some rear-exiting flesh...

 I'm not "trying to get away with" ANYTHING! 

Hargis, as early back as the 60's, said to many people, including Penn Jones and Jim Garrison during the trial-that he "Rode into the matter" that exploded from "THE SIDE OF HIS (JFK's) HEAD".  He did not see anything happen to the back of his head, as you contend-and he had the perfect view of the back of JFK's head.  Instead, he saw the right SIDE of JFK's head explode-his words not mine..  Sorry, but you are way behind the times, Brian.  This is all old stuff that only a well studied researcher already knows.

Clint Hill, the man who is all over the place when he was placing his hand on where he said the head would was.  He's also the same man who, in recent years, began saying that the entire brain of JFK was gone, and that "there was nothing there". And you're also lying about what you say he saw in the back seat.

You've just shown that you know absolutely zero about forensics.  The head matter that exited the top of the head the and went all over the Connally's, and Kellerman the windshield, hood, sun visors (right sun visor, both sides of it), interior, side rails, etc. I have made gif's of matter falling out of the front, top of the head, as JFK falls forward and sideways, onto Mrs. Kennedy, and it spills out of that massive hole in top of the head which the autopsy photo I just posted clearly reveals. 

 Mark Bell did NOT capture the assassination on film, so you're wrong about that, as well.
 

[Steve Barber]

    As you posted, Jackie said "TOP of his head". Not the "side" or the "upper side" or the "top side", but TOP.  That Flap is not the TOP of the head.

Correct.  That skull portion I circled is a portion of the area that she put the skull fragment back into place. All you have to do is look at Z frames 335 and 337, and you'll that massive portion of the skull hanging by scalp to the front of the ear and extending over the temple.  That skull is rounded because it connects to the head where the side of the head and the top meet.  Look also at the "Rear of the head" autopsy photo that shows this large skull fragment in the same position as seen in the Zapruder film. 

[Royell Storing]

Correct.  That skull portion I circled is a portion of the area that she put the skull fragment back into place. All you have to do is look at Z frames 335 and 337, and you'll that massive portion of the skull hanging by scalp to the front of the ear and extending over the temple.  That skull is rounded because it connects to the head where the side of the head and the top meet.  Look also at the "Rear of the head" autopsy photo that shows this large skull fragment in the same position as seen in the Zapruder film.

    You have access to better JFK Assassination images than I do. This access is Not restricted to the Zapruder Film. I'll take your word for the Z Frames 335 and 337 descriptions.
    The autopsy photos are a different story. The Lifton revelation of "surgery to the head area" taints the autopsy photos. Also, what do we know with certainty happened to the body of JFK, IMMEDIATELY AFTER the SS flexed their muscle and forcibly took possession of the ceremonial casket at Parkland Hospital?

[Steve Barber]

Wrong...

You are just digging your hole deeper...

JFK's "side of the head" that Carrico gestures towards is facing the Knoll at the time Carrico said it was avulsive and ejecting in that direction...

You are misquoting Hargis who said the splatter hit him so hard he thought he had been shot by the bullet...That statement matches the splatter seen in that direction on the seat back cushion...You can't get around that and it is hard blood splatter forensic evidence in a direction that seriously conflicts with what Carrico is saying...

Hill went from saying too much and exactly describing the front to back Occipital wound and plug of gore to adjusting his story to resemble the official story wound just like Carrico...

The hole that you've dug yourself into is so deep you'll never see the surface, so don't talk to me about digging holes, Brian.

 I have corrected so many mistakes you've made, then completely ignore.

 Of course Dr. Carrico is talking about the right side of the head! Avulsed means a body part that has been completely torn or pulled away by force.  Look up the word.  And Dr. Carrico is describing what he saw in that area after the bullet exited the top of the head.  So you're going to tell us that the mess I surrounded in red doesn't look avulsed to you?  Why of course not! To you!  You see only what you want to see, and what you "see" is fantasy. Where Dr. Carrico has his fingers placed on his head isn't where the wound is, and I am definitely not saying that it is, either.  Where he has his fingers is where the large skull flap/piece is hanging by scalp, a portion of which connects to the top of the skull.  Funny thing.   Almost everyone who describes JFK's head wound thinks that that massive skull fragment is the head wound, when it isn't.  It's a flap of skull hanging upside down and inside out, facing the camera.

I am not misquoting Hargis!  Hargis never, at any time, said that he was hit by a "force"!  Get with the program, Brian.   Tink Thompson started that crap in "Six Seconds in Dallas" about Hargis being hit with such "force...", and then he inserted something Hargis said to the New York Daily News the day after the assassination to try to make his point. Nowhere at any time during any of the interviews Hargis gave to individuals or groups that have been made public about being struck by head matter with any "force".