"...It appears something has happened in the motorcade route..."

[John Corbett]

Pate left KBOX before making the recording

In any event, presenting a reenactment of an event as if it were an actual broadcast is serious breach of journalistic ethics. It's called manufacturing the news. It is a fraudulent practice.

[Michael Capasse]

In any event, presenting a reenactment of an event as if it were an actual broadcast is serious breach of journalistic ethics. It's called manufacturing the news. It is a fraudulent practice.

It was a sound bite on a record for entertainment. It wasn't broadcast as news
nobody described as the day it happened

[John Corbett]

It was a sound bite on a record for entertainment. It wasn't broadcast as news
nobody described as the day it happened

Every documentary that has used that recording and not identified it as a re-enactment has perpetrated a fraud. The originators of the recording also perpetrated a fraud if they didn't identify it as a re-enactment. It is not a broadcast of an actual event.

[Michael Capasse]

In any event, presenting a reenactment of an event as if it were an actual broadcast is serious breach of journalistic ethics. It's called manufacturing the news. It is a fraudulent practice.

  It was a record for entertainment purposes
One line. It was not news. True statement

It is not a broadcast of an actual event.

nobody claimed it was.

[John Corbett]

  It was a record for entertainment purposes
One line. Nobody claimed it was 11//22. True statement

nobody claimed it was.

When it is presented whether in its original form or reused in a documentary and not identified as a re-enactment, it is a fraud. Failure to do so implies it is an actual recording made during the assassination. For years, I believed it was a recording of the actual event and I would bet most people who heard it believed the same thing. I would be a lot of people still believe it to be a recording of a live broadcast. That makes it a fraud.

[Michael Capasse]

When it is presented whether in its original form or reused in a documentary and not identified as a re-enactment, it is a fraud. Failure to do so implies it is an actual recording made during the assassination. For years, I believed it was a recording of the actual event and I would bet most people who heard it believed the same thing. I would be a lot of people still believe it to be a recording of a live broadcast. That makes it a fraud.

  Oh, so painful