Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell  (Read 1230 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5624
Re: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2026, 09:13:43 PM »
Apologies for any issues.
Will make sure it's done like this from now on.

   DAN - Thanks for the lengthy in-depth work you are putting in on this project. I look forward to delving into the nuts-n-bolts when said project is completed.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Reply #15 on: Today at 04:47:40 PM »


    I see this as a time-wasting analysis designed to give credibility to bogus claims and evidence denial...

Online Mark A. Oblazney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 505
Re: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Reply #16 on: Today at 05:08:23 PM »

    I see this as a time-wasting analysis designed to give credibility to bogus claims and evidence denial...

at least they’re posting images to try and support their views on the matter, Albert.
all you have are words stuffed into huge paragraphs !  change your stylist maybe?

Online Brian Doyle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Reply #17 on: Today at 05:37:14 PM »
at least they’re posting images to try and support their views on the matter, Albert.
all you have are words stuffed into huge paragraphs !  change your stylist maybe?


   Form over substance...

No credible researcher doubts the pair going up the extension are Lovelady & Shelley...I see any elevated attempt to deny it as intentional trouble-making for the purpose of disrupting good research...Obfuscation through false rigor...

I'm surprised such a skilled researcher like Armstrong would risk his credibility by making denial of the pair as being Lovelady & Shelley a hill to die on like he does...

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5624
Re: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Reply #18 on: Today at 08:48:27 PM »

   Form over substance...

No credible researcher doubts the pair going up the extension are Lovelady & Shelley...I see any elevated attempt to deny it as intentional trouble-making for the purpose of disrupting good research...Obfuscation through false rigor...

I'm surprised such a skilled researcher like Armstrong would risk his credibility by making denial of the pair as being Lovelady & Shelley a hill to die on like he does...

    There are several issues tying into the Darnell Film timeline. You instead concentrate on 1 single thing. Too bad.