The JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate
Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
Mark A. Oblazney:
--- Quote from: Brian Doyle on August 22, 2026, 04:47:40 PM ---
I see this as a time-wasting analysis designed to give credibility to bogus claims and evidence denial...
--- End quote ---
at least they’re posting images to try and support their views on the matter, Albert.
all you have are words stuffed into huge paragraphs ! change your stylist maybe?
Brian Doyle:
--- Quote from: Mark A. Oblazney on August 22, 2026, 05:08:23 PM ---at least they’re posting images to try and support their views on the matter, Albert.
all you have are words stuffed into huge paragraphs ! change your stylist maybe?
--- End quote ---
Form over substance...
No credible researcher doubts the pair going up the extension are Lovelady & Shelley...I see any elevated attempt to deny it as intentional trouble-making for the purpose of disrupting good research...Obfuscation through false rigor...
I'm surprised such a skilled researcher like Armstrong would risk his credibility by making denial of the pair as being Lovelady & Shelley a hill to die on like he does...
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Brian Doyle on August 22, 2026, 05:37:14 PM ---
Form over substance...
No credible researcher doubts the pair going up the extension are Lovelady & Shelley...I see any elevated attempt to deny it as intentional trouble-making for the purpose of disrupting good research...Obfuscation through false rigor...
I'm surprised such a skilled researcher like Armstrong would risk his credibility by making denial of the pair as being Lovelady & Shelley a hill to die on like he does...
--- End quote ---
There are several issues tying into the Darnell Film timeline. You instead concentrate on 1 single thing. Too bad.
Dan O'meara:
--- Quote from: Brian Doyle on August 22, 2026, 05:37:14 PM ---
Form over substance...
No credible researcher doubts the pair going up the extension are Lovelady & Shelley...I see any elevated attempt to deny it as intentional trouble-making for the purpose of disrupting good research...Obfuscation through false rigor...
I'm surprised such a skilled researcher like Armstrong would risk his credibility by making denial of the pair as being Lovelady & Shelley a hill to die on like he does...
--- End quote ---
No one is interested in what you think.
You have demonstrated yourself to be a complete nobody, incapable of supporting any of the bogus claims you make.
Why do you even bother posting?
Dan O'meara:
--- Quote from: Brian Doyle on August 25, 2026, 04:03:39 PM ---
Anyone who doubts the pair are Lovelady & Shelley is just in self-deceiving denial...
--- End quote ---
The single piece of 'evidence' identifying the men as Shelley and Lovelady is the doctored image Bart Kamp "sharpened".
It is this single piece of highly questionable 'evidence' you have based your identification on.
Unfortunately, you lack the courage to admit this, which is in keeping with the way you have conducted yourself on this forum.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version