Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell  (Read 15067 times)

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Reply #140 on: Yesterday at 11:54:15 PM »
    Yeah, it's tough for some to admit they bought into a JFK Urban Legend. But, as the definition of the JFK assassination images improves, this is going to become more common. So you need to get used to it. This explains why NBC has Never released the Original Darnell and Wiegman Films. And, why we have been waiting for the Sixth Floor Museum to release the last half of the early generation copy of the Darnell Film. Should the Sixth Floor Museum release that last half of the Darnell Film, we are gonna clearly see a Bogus DPD Motorcycle Cop strolling across the train yard and toward the TSBD.

"Yeah, it's tough for some to admit they bought into a JFK  Urban Legend" ? 

 Royell, I'm sorry, but this whole idea regarding Wiegman is nuts.  No one-that I know of-has ever questioned the position of Dave Wiegman as he filmed the Hester couple reacting to the shooting that happened near them, and obviously nor do they care.

  Some of the stuff you're saying in your posts about Wiegman's actions in a film clip lasting less than a second is nothing short of bizarre.
 
You say Wiegman is "running and ..." and I see nothing more than a man sprawled on three concrete stair steps connected to a terrace filming with his news camera. You say it's unusual for him to be in that position, and "Who does that?"  I'll tell you who. News people do outrageous things just to get something on film, or to get a "scoop", everyday.  What's so unusual about getting down on concrete stairs to be on the same level with a couple who are reacting to the assassination?  It had rained that morning.  The grass and ground were wet, water spots can clearly be seen on the concrete stairs inches from him.  Perhaps Wiegman didn't want to ruin his suit, or get wet. It's really insulting that you stoop to the level of saying that people "Bought into an urban legend".  No one has bought into anything, and why would anyone care? Clearly, Wiegman was only interested in getting the Hester couples' reaction to what they just witnessed,  You insist that Wiegman tripped or ran into a chuck hole.  Based on what?   
« Last Edit: Today at 12:09:22 AM by Steve Barber »