Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The Real Face Of The Real Babushka Lady  (Read 151 times)

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1957
Re: The Real Face Of The Real Babushka Lady
« Reply #7 on: Today at 06:43:22 PM »
What about "the images"?
You're supposed to locate the supposed images taken by an unknown woman some 60+ years ago. It's not up to the person making the claim to prove the existence of any images. Or find the name of the person, et cetera. No, it's up to you to find them and explain what happened to them.

Meanwhile, the person making the claim makes *no effort* on his own to track down his question.

Conspiracy 101: Make a claim, do no research on his own to examine the claim, and then demand the claim is proven wrong.




Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5594
Re: The Real Face Of The Real Babushka Lady
« Reply #8 on: Today at 07:14:34 PM »
Assassination researcher Gary Mack testified before the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) in 1994 that he had been told by an executive in Kodak's Dallas office that a woman in her early 30s with brunette hair brought in film purported to be of the assassination scene while they were processing the Zapruder film.
According to Mack, the executive said the woman explained to federal investigators already at the film processing office that she ran from Main Street across the grass to Elm Street where she stopped and snapped a photo.
Mack said that he was told by the Kodak executive that the photo was extremely blurry and "virtually useless" and indicated that the woman likely went home without anyone recording her identity.
A similar account was given by Kodak technician Jack Harrison.
Mr Harrison claimed to have developed a color film for a brunette woman in her 30s or 40s on the day of the assassination.
He recalled that the picture had good exposure but was out of focus and considered useless.


    I do Not see a designation as to Who or What Govt Body ended up with possession of this "VIRTUALLY useless" photo. What was "virtually useless" in 1963 would probably Not be "virtually useless" 10 yrs later. And they Know this.
    On a good copy of the Current Zapruder Film, the "Bright Gold" reflection coming off of the Babushka Camera is unlike any reflection that I have seen that day. Do we know for a fact that the Babushka Camera was Not a Movie Camera?