Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?  (Read 208 times)

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1415
Re: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2026, 02:20:29 PM »
If that's what you took from what I wrote, Your reading comprehension is really, really bad. Almost as bad as your powers of reasoning.

No, I got it right. In fact, exactly right. You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. As your own statement indicates, nobody, including yourself, believes this early missed shot nonsense, but don't let a lack of evidence or proof stop you from continuing to prattle on about it.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2004
Re: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2026, 11:52:50 PM »
No, I got it right. In fact, exactly right. You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. As your own statement indicates, nobody, including yourself, believes this early missed shot nonsense, but don't let a lack of evidence or proof stop you from continuing to prattle on about it.

You're even dumber than I thought.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4113
Re: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 01:34:44 AM »
You're even dumber than I thought.

He's really, really ignorant.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1415
Re: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?
« Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 04:09:41 AM »
So which one is right. Which fictional early missed shot, a shot that there is no evidence of having taken place and not one single person even heard is the correct early missed shot. Can the Early Missed Shot Corbett- Graves Brain Trust hash it out and give some much-needed clarity to such a profound theory? It would help with understanding how you two could possibly criticize any other theory.

Online Jarrett Smith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
Re: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?
« Reply #11 on: Yesterday at 04:50:46 AM »
So which one is right. Which fictional early missed shot, a shot that there is no evidence of having taken place and not one single person even heard is the correct early missed shot. Can the Early Missed Shot Corbett- Graves Brain Trust hash it out and give some much-needed clarity to such a profound theory? It would help with understanding how you two could possibly criticize any other theory.



Both Connally and Jack Ready turn to their right after hearing the first shot fired at Z-157

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4113
Re: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?
« Reply #12 on: Yesterday at 05:04:28 AM »
So which one is right. Which fictional early missed shot, a shot that there is no evidence of having taken place and not one single person even heard is the correct early missed shot. Can the Early Missed Shot Corbett- Graves Brain Trust hash it out and give some much-needed clarity to such a profound theory? It would help with understanding how you two could possibly criticize any other theory.

Dear Jack "Ignoramus" Nessan,

How do you know JFK didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why he quickly started turning his head to his left in Z-144, only to start turning it back to his right by Z-160 and start waving to Mary Wooward and her three colleagues in Z-175?

How do you know that Jackie didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why she started turning her head farther to her left in Z-144 and then far back to her right starting in Z-170?

How do you know that John Connally didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why he consciously and quickly turned his head to his left starting in Z-150 and then quickly turned it back far to his right, starting in Z-164, to try to catch a glimpse of JFK over his right shoulder from Z-175 through Z-190?

How do you know that Nellie Connally didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why she began a quick sweeping head
turn to her right in Z-145?

How do you know Roy Kellerman didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why he began leaning over and looking
behind/down to his right in Z-143?

How do you know Jack Ready didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why he started leaning to his right and turning his head around in Z-145?

How do you know Glen Bennett didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why he started leaning over to his far right to seee around Dave powers by Z-160?

How do you know George Hickey didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why he began leaning over and looking down in the direction of the rear tire or pavement in Z-144?

How do you know Rosemary Willis didn't hear Oswald's first, missing-everything, "Z-124" shot, and that's why she began a quick look away from
the Presidential limo and back towards the TSBD in Z-140?

-- Tom
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 06:15:22 AM by Tom Graves »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2004
Re: Why didn't Clint Hill hear the first shot?
« Reply #13 on: Yesterday at 11:37:06 AM »
So which one is right. Which fictional early missed shot, a shot that there is no evidence of having taken place and not one single person even heard is the correct early missed shot. Can the Early Missed Shot Corbett- Graves Brain Trust hash it out and give some much-needed clarity to such a profound theory? It would help with understanding how you two could possibly criticize any other theory.

You are lying. There were three spent shells found in the sniper's nest. There was a clear consensus among the witnesses that that were three shots. The witnesses who only remembered hearing two were those in one of the two limos that were straddled by four accelerating motorcycles. The three witnesses closest to the shooter, the employees on the fifth floor, all testified to hearing three shots. The fact there is a disagreement as to precisely that shot occurred is not an indication there was no such shot. It simply reflects the fact that the evidence for when that shot occurred is less than conclusive.

If there's no snow on the ground when you go to bed and when you wake up, there's snow on the ground, it is a logical conclusion that it snowed overnight. Would you have to know precisely when it snowed to reach that conclusion?