Credibility of the Zapruder film. CIA employee Dino Brugioni's account.

[James Slater]

OK, instead of me being in the Woodward debate I'll start a credibility thread and leave those guys to it.
I'll start with CIA employee Dino Brugioni who was the first expert to analyse the film in the CIA National Photographic Interpretation Center 24th November 1963.
This youtube video shows the interview with Dino as well as the chain of custody being discussed.

[Tommy Shanks]

Brugoni is not a credible witness, as people like Pat Speer have illuminated: https://www.patspeer.com/chapter-19d-stuck-in-the-middle-with-you

Another researcher named Craig Bouzarth has also done some great work on the Z-film, and I am convinced he's once and for all shown that the film couldn't have been altered.

[Royell Storing]

This place is laughable. Nell and John Connally are not credible witnesses because both their statements to the Warren commission disagreed with Specter's single bullet theory. They both stated JBC was shot two seconds after Kennedy was shot in the neck area. The forums answer: Not credible witnesses, lunatics.
Brugoni was a CIA operative who was a trained expert in image and film analysis, gave his entire working life to the CIA and had an impeccable reputation. Brugoni stated the Zapruder film we see today is not the one he saw on 24th Novemeber 1963. The forums answer: Not a credible witness, lunatic.
Meanwhile back in Dealey Plaza Howard Brennan saw Oswald through a brick wall, described his height, weight, how good looking he was and his build, passed into onto Dallas Police and that exact description was used to identify Oswald in the cinema. The forums answer: What a guy, get that man a beer.
This forum shouldn't be called the JFK assassination forum it should be called the JFK official narrative assassination forum.
Arlen Specter, a congressman. not a lawyer, not a weapons expert, not a forensic pathologist, not an investigator, not anything but a congressman. He comes up with a theory that a bullet can do all kinds of weird things even though the Connally's told him it didn't happen that way and you believed it hook line and sinker.
Very good - crack on.

       I don't support the SBT, but Specter did graduate from Yale Law School in 1956. Give the man his due.

[Dan O'meara]

Read the Zavada report.
It's tedious but by the end of it all thoughts of alteration of the Z-film will be long gone.
It is ridiculously comprehensive.

[James Slater]

       I don't support the SBT, but Specter did graduate from Yale Law School in 1956. Give the man his due.

His role was assistant council for the panel but he took over the whole god damn show.
He's not a weapons expert or forensic pathologist who would be qualified to put forward a theory. The fact of the matter is Kellerman told them there was a flurry of shots similar to a sonic boom all coming at once. Jean Hill told them there were 4 to 6 shots and the last 4 all came together, countless other testimony telling them the shots came in together yet they allowed Specter to push this nonsense we've had to chew on for over 60 years.
The Connally's who were in the limo for Gods sake pushed aside and made fools out of so this idiot can prevail. i've seen the phone call between Hoover and LBJ before the warren commission got started. Three shots and one gunman and that was that, they were never going to allow anything else.
E Howard Hunt said it all in his confession about LBJ.

[James Slater]

Read the Zavada report.
It's tedious but by the end of it all thoughts of alteration of the Z-film will be long gone.
It is ridiculously comprehensive.

No thanks, I'll listen to Dino's version of events. He was there on the 24th November 63, worked on the film, is a CIA expert on image and film analysis and only his opinion matters to me. Rest of it is absolute speculation.

This place is laughable. Nell and John Connally are not credible witnesses because both their statements to the Warren commission disagreed with Specter's single bullet theory. They both stated JBC was shot two seconds after Kennedy was shot in the neck area. The forums answer: Not credible witnesses, lunatics.
Brugoni was a CIA operative who was a trained expert in image and film analysis, gave his entire working life to the CIA and had an impeccable reputation. Brugoni stated the Zapruder film we see today is not the one he saw on 24th Novemeber 1963. The forums answer: Not a credible witness, lunatic.
Meanwhile back in Dealey Plaza Howard Brennan saw Oswald through a brick wall, described his height, weight, how good looking he was and his build, passed into onto Dallas Police and that exact description was used to identify Oswald in the cinema. The forums answer: What a guy, get that man a beer.
This forum shouldn't be called the JFK assassination forum it should be called the JFK official narrative assassination forum.
Arlen Specter, a congressman. not a lawyer, not a weapons expert, not a forensic pathologist, not an investigator, not anything but a congressman. He comes up with a theory that a bullet can do all kinds of weird things even though the Connally's told him it didn't happen that way and you believed it hook line and sinker.
Very good - crack on.

[Tommy Shanks]

No thanks, I'll listen to Dino's version of events. He was there on the 24th November 63, worked on the film, is a CIA expert on image and film analysis and only his opinion matters to me. Rest of it is absolute speculation.

You claim "this place is laughable" yet you outright refuse to read a detailed report by the world's foremost expert on the film Zapruder used on Nov. 22, 1963? Only the long-discredited "opinion" of a single other person "matters to you" ? If that's your childish attitude, why are you even here?