Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?  (Read 7414 times)

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2131
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #98 on: August 15, 2026, 05:47:17 PM »
No...

The fact the authorities never followed-through to ask Jarman, Lovelady, or name the un-named cop and interrogate that cop, is the stronger evidence here and evidence of a cover-up you have failed to credibly answer

How do you interrogate and unnamed cop?
Quote

...You are in denial of the fact that the 1963 investigation should have been very enthusiastic to get someone to confirm they saw Oswald leave through the front door...Especially after being told to step aside and wait by a cop...

Who saw that happen?
Quote

But that's not what happened and every investigative authority that touched this did the opposite and buried it...This should have been explosive when Jarman told it in 1977 but the exact opposite happened and shortly after Lovelady dies...Hmmm...Conspiracy research would be really great if it wasn't for Conspiracy researchers...

What was there to bury? An unconfirmed hearsay rumor?
Quote

You're hand-waving Corbett and you are badly failing to answer the question of why Lovelady did not tell this to the FBI or Warren Commission in 1963?...The reason why Lovelady held this back in 1963 is because his partner Shelley led Oswald out the Loading Dock after Oswald was told to step aside and wait by a cop at the front door...

Who witnessed that?
Quote

This was expository of the conspiracy and evidenced Shelley's knowledge of who Oswald was and therefore exposed the conspiracy...]

How does Shelley knowing who Oswald was expose a conspiracy. You've got a few holes to fill there, Columbo.
Quote

It is also the reason why they with-held the name of the cop at the front door and never investigated Oswald's departure from the Depository...

Who named the cop that nobody saw stop Oswald?
Quote

Things you unaccountably have no curiosity over except for weak excuse-making...

Well, you've got me there. I have no interest in rumors based on third hand accounts of an event nobody witnesses.
Quote

For the Conspiracy community to ignore this is a crime against their own practice...

This is one time I will side with the "Conspiracy community".

Online Brian Doyle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #99 on: August 16, 2026, 03:23:50 PM »


Both Holmes and Lovelady spoke of a cop who stopped Oswald at the front door...

There was a conspicuous effort to avoid investigating how Oswald left the Depository...

You are avoiding giving an honest answer to the fact that the reason that cop was never identified and interviewed was because they were avoiding having to answer how and why Oswald left the Depository if a cop told him to step aside and wait...

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2131
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #100 on: August 16, 2026, 04:56:19 PM »

Both Holmes and Lovelady spoke of a cop who stopped Oswald at the front door...

Neither if them witnessed that. They were repeating hearsay,
Quote

There was a conspicuous effort to avoid investigating how Oswald left the Depository...

They knew Oswald left the front of the building end headed east on Elm St. where he boarded a bus. Do you think chasing down rumors based on hearsay would change that fact? [quote
]
You are avoiding giving an honest answer to the fact that the reason that cop was never identified and interviewed was because they were avoiding having to answer how and why Oswald left the Depository if a cop told him to step aside and wait...
[/quote]

If? There was zero evidence a cop stopped him outside the TSBD. Do you think rumors constitute evidence?

Why do you treat rumors as if they are compelling evidence?

Online Brian Doyle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #101 on: Yesterday at 04:55:36 PM »
Neither if them witnessed that. They were repeating hearsay,
They knew Oswald left the front of the building end headed east on Elm St. where he boarded a bus. Do you think chasing down rumors based on hearsay would change that fact?
\
Why do you treat rumors as if they are compelling evidence?


That's not a credible reply...

Lovelady told Jarman he saw the cop at the front door stop Oswald and make him go back inside the Lobby...

Your answer isn't believable because they spent so much time and investigation on everything else...

No...The reason why they made no effort to investigate Oswald's leaving the Depository is because they did not want to open up the Pandora's Box of Lee stumbling in to the SE stairs side of the Lobby at the same time Harvey was at the front door...Harvey panicked and tried to leave through the front door...Lovelady then saw the un-named cop stop Harvey and pull him back in to the Lobby...Lee pulled a U-Turn at the base of the SE stairs and hid in the Utility closet where he was later seen by Campbell...Lovelady planted this lie with Jarman because he was trying to cover-up the fact Shelley saw what was going on and intervened as Oswald's "Superintendent"...Shelley then led Harvey out the Loading Dock and around the police detention...This is what Stone and DiEugenio should have presented to Luna, not the already-refuted Prayer Man theory...

Holmes heard it from Oswald's own mouth at the Police Station on Sunday...Your calling it hearsay is just your desperation to deny the obvious...


Quote
If? There was zero evidence a cop stopped him outside the TSBD. Do you think rumors constitute evidence?


The reason there was zero evidence is because the investigating authorities covered it up...Covering-up and disappearing information allows nay-sayers to come back later and declare there's no evidence...It wasn't outside the Depository...It was at the front door when Harvey panicked and tried to bolt out right under the nose of the cop because Lee blundered in to the other side of the Lobby...(I'm solving the puzzle in the Depository here)...People are ignoring it under the excuse that my reputation precedes me...
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 05:01:47 PM by Brian Doyle »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2131
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #102 on: Yesterday at 05:09:35 PM »

That's not a credible reply...

Lovelady told Jarman he saw the cop at the front door stop Oswald and make him go back inside the Lobby...

Your answer isn't believable because they spent so much time and investigation on everything else...

No...The reason why they made no effort to investigate Oswald's leaving the Depository is because they did not want to open up the Pandora's Box of Lee stumbling in to the SE stairs side of the Lobby at the same time Harvey was at the front door...Harvey panicked and tried to leave through the front door...Lovelady then saw the un-named cop stop Harvey and pull him back in to the Lobby...Lee pulled a U-Turn at the base of the SE stairs and hid in the Utility closet where he was later seen by Campbell...Lovelady planted this lie with Jarman because he was trying to cover-up the fact Shelley saw what was going on and intervened as Oswald's "Superintendent"...Shelley then led Harvey out the Loading Dock and around the police detention...This is what Stone and DiEugenio should have presented to Luna, not the already-refuted Prayer Man theory...

Holmes heard it from Oswald's own mouth at the Police Station on Sunday...Your calling it hearsay is just your desperation to deny the obvious...



The reason there was zero evidence is because the investigating authorities covered it up...Covering-up and disappearing information allows nay-sayers to come back later and declare there's no evidence...It wasn't outside the Depository...It was at the front door when Harvey panicked and tried to bolt out right under the nose of the cop because Lee blundered in to the other side of the Lobby...(I'm solving the puzzle in the Depository here)...People are ignoring it under the excuse that my reputation precedes me...

Unless you have record of Lovelady saying he saw that happen, it is hearsay. IOW a rumor.

The fact that you think Harvey and Lee were two different people reveals just how nutty you are.