Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?

[Tommy Shanks]

Some of the biggest nuts in the case.

 The Harvey and Lee nuts.

Body alteration nuts.

All the evidence was altered nuts

Fred

Unfortunately there are several people right here on this board that believe the above. Kinda amazing, hilarious and sad all at the same time.

[Martin Weidmann]

Unfortunately there are several people right here on this board that believe the above. Kinda amazing, hilarious and sad all at the same time.

I'm sure the people you are talking about (I'm not one of them) think the same about people who dismiss those possibilities.

Both sides have people who think, for some reason that's utterly beyond me, that, despite the fact that they have no first hand information, think that their opinion is the only correct one.

[Brian Doyle]

It's hilarious that you act as if you are the smartest person on this forum when the reality is you are the dumbest.

No, I get it...

The FBI and Warren Commission did ZERO investigation of one of the most important events in the Depository, in the form of how Oswald left the Depository, because what I wrote above is just completely ridiculous and doesn't give a shockingly tight-fitting reason for it...I get it...

And, even though, in a presidential assassination, Lovelady not telling the authorities in the original 1963 investigation that he saw Oswald exit through the front door is, technically, a with-holding of evidence crime, that HSCA and FBI just decided to not confront Lovelady cause, ah, ehm, they already knew...Yeah, that's the ticket because you know how forgiving those Specter-types are...This is the same FBI that committed Ralph Yates...But, no, I get it...

Still waiting for you to give a credible answer to that...

[John Corbett]

No, I get it...

The FBI and Warren Commission did ZERO investigation of one of the most important events in the Depository, in the form of how Oswald left the Depository, because what I wrote above is just completely ridiculous and doesn't give a shockingly tight-fitting reason for it...I get it...

It is only important to someone who doesn't know how to weigh evidence. It's a real nothing burger.

And, even though, in a presidential assassination, Lovelady not telling the authorities in the original 1963 investigation that he saw Oswald exit through the front door is, technically, a with-holding of evidence crime, that HSCA and FBI just decided to not confront Lovelady cause, ah, ehm, they already knew...Yeah, that's the ticket because you know how forgiving those Specter-types are...This is the same FBI that committed Ralph Yates...But, no, I get it...

Still waiting for you to give a credible answer to that...

Billy Lovelady testified that he heard Oswald in the east elevator as he was breaking for lunch but did not actually see him. When asked if he saw Oswald after that his one word answer was "No". He wouldn't have seen Oswald leave building because after the shooting, Gloria Calvary told him and Bill Shelley that the President had been shot and he and Shelley then headed down the Elm. St. extension toward the railroad tracks. It's amazing how you could dream up your BS story from that.

[Martin Weidmann]

It is only important to someone who doesn't know how to weigh evidence. It's a real nothing burger.
Billy Lovelady testified that he heard Oswald in the east elevator as he was breaking for lunch but did not actually see him. When asked if he saw Oswald after that his one word answer was "No". He wouldn't have seen Oswald leave building because after the shooting, Gloria Calvary told him and Bill Shelley that the President had been shot and he and Shelley then headed down the Elm. St. extension toward the railroad tracks. It's amazing how you could dream up your BS story from that.

It is only important to someone who doesn't know how to weigh evidence.

And you know how to weigh evidence? Really?

[John Corbett]

It is only important to someone who doesn't know how to weigh evidence.

And you know how to weigh evidence? Really?

Yes, I do. That's why I was able to figure out a long time ago that LHO killed JFK and that there is zero evidence he had even a single accomplice. I could be convinced otherwise if somebody could present actual evidence to the contrary but it's been almost 63 years since JFK was killed and the chances of that happening get more remote with each passing year.