Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Martin Weidmann

Author Topic: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?  (Read 72 times)

Offline Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4044
Question: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?

Answer: Because the anomaly-replete assassination is fertile grounds for KGB-encouraged anti-"Deep State" / anti-"National Security State" / anti-"Administrative State" tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories.
« Last Edit: Today at 07:53:17 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum



Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8336
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #1 on: Today at 07:51:31 AM »
Question: Why do JFK assassination forums draw all of the nut cases?

Answer: Because the anomaly-replete assassination is fertile grounds for KGB-encouraged anti-"Deep State" / anti-"National Security State" / anti-"Administrative State" tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories.

Said the biggest nut case of them all!

Offline Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4044
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #2 on: Today at 07:54:38 AM »
Said the biggest nut case of them all!

Which is your JFKA bête noire, Weidmann?

Peter Dale Scott's "Deep State," Jimmy DiEugenio's "National Security State," or Steve Bannon's "Administrative State"?

It doesn't matter which one you choose -- Vladimir Putin loves them all for their nation-rending qualities.

« Last Edit: Today at 08:43:44 AM by Tom Graves »

Online James Slater

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #3 on: Today at 11:24:19 AM »
Question: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?

Answer: Because the anomaly-replete assassination is fertile grounds for KGB-encouraged anti-"Deep State" / anti-"National Security State" / anti-"Administrative State" tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories.
I've researched the assassination for almost 40 years. I've seen some pretty good evidence pointing towards the official narrative and some good evidence pointing away from it especially on JFK Lancer before it was hacked. JFK Lancer was the biggest website in the world for those interested in assassination research for either the official narrative or otherwise. Over 60% of Americans believe that the murder of their president was an orchestrated plot carried out by more than one person. The HSCA (house select committee on assassinations) in 1977 concluded that the assassination was more than likely a conspiracy involving more than one person.
I've seen many theories online, the driver did it, the SS agent in the follow up car did it, Jackie Kennedy did it and one person suggested LBJ did it from one of the follow up cars. All I've been interested in are the facts of what happened in Dealey Plaza on that fateful day. The testimony of those who watched it, those that sat in the limo and those that were involved in the investigation. From that we can only try and piece together what actually happened.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #4 on: Today at 11:54:19 AM »
The JFKA hobby/industry is fueled by a desire people have to want a more interesting answer than that some little nobody named Lee Harvey Oswald learned the POTUS was going to be riding past his workplace in a slow moving open top car and decided to take advantage of a once in a lifetime opportunity to become somebody famous. For maybe the first time in his life he succeeded.

The fact is that JFK's fondness for appearing in public before adoring crowds riding in a slow moving open top limo made him an inviting target for a malcontent like Oswald. It was JFK's bad luck that his motorcade by random chance got routed right past that malcontent's workplace making it very easy for him. If it hadn't happened in Dallas, it might have been some other little loser in some other city who took advantage of JFK's willingness to expose himself to danger.

For some reason, people don't want to accept the obvious answer, the answer the DPD had come to on day one. I was in 7th grade in Omaha on that day was in math class, our first period after lunch when our principal made the announcement over the loudspeaker that the President and the Governor had been shot in Texas. Our teacher, Sister Gerald, immediately turned on her radio. It seem like just a short time later the announcement was made that JFK had died. Classes were called off for the day and we all went across the street to the church where Father Evans led us all in praying a rosary. We were then dismissed and I went home. I was surprised when a short time after that, I learned the suspect was already in custody. That's when I learned he had also killed a cop. I knew nothing about the details of the assassination but from the moment I saw Oswald on TV, I never had any doubt he was the assassin. Even when I was briefly brought over to the CT side, I never doubted Oswald was the gunman, even when I believed there was a second gunman.

A CBS documentary in 1988 was the first time I learned some of the basic details of the assassination. The layout of Dealey Plaza, the motorcade route through it, and the position of the TSBD. It was the first time I saw the Z-film. That's when I really started to study the JFKA and learned more than just the basics of it. The more I learned, the more I became convinced Oswald was the one and only gunman and that there was no credible evidence he had even a single accomplice. I continue to hold that belief almost 40 years later.

Online James Slater

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 12:18:50 PM »
The JFKA hobby/industry is fueled by a desire people have to want a more interesting answer than that some little nobody named Lee Harvey Oswald learned the POTUS was going to be riding past his workplace in a slow moving open top car and decided to take advantage of a once in a lifetime opportunity to become somebody famous. For maybe the first time in his life he succeeded.

The fact is that JFK's fondness for appearing in public before adoring crowds riding in a slow moving open top limo made him an inviting target for a malcontent like Oswald. It was JFK's bad luck that his motorcade by random chance got routed right past that malcontent's workplace making it very easy for him. If it hadn't happened in Dallas, it might have been some other little loser in some other city who took advantage of JFK's willingness to expose himself to danger.

For some reason, people don't want to accept the obvious answer, the answer the DPD had come to on day one. I was in 7th grade in Omaha on that day was in math class, our first period after lunch when our principal made the announcement over the loudspeaker that the President and the Governor had been shot in Texas. Our teacher, Sister Gerald, immediately turned on her radio. It seem like just a short time later the announcement was made that JFK had died. Classes were called off for the day and we all went across the street to the church where Father Evans led us all in praying a rosary. We were then dismissed and I went home. I was surprised when a short time after that, I learned the suspect was already in custody. That's when I learned he had also killed a cop. I knew nothing about the details of the assassination but from the moment I saw Oswald on TV, I never had any doubt he was the assassin. Even when I was briefly brought over to the CT side, I never doubted Oswald was the gunman, even when I believed there was a second gunman.

A CBS documentary in 1988 was the first time I learned some of the basic details of the assassination. The layout of Dealey Plaza, the motorcade route through it, and the position of the TSBD. It was the first time I saw the Z-film. That's when I really started to study the JFKA and learned more than just the basics of it. The more I learned, the more I became convinced Oswald was the one and only gunman and that there was no credible evidence he had even a single accomplice. I continue to hold that belief almost 40 years later.
I would disagree with that conclusion. It is fuelled in my opinion by people like myself who find the official narrative questionable, in fact very questionable.
You are suggesting that narratives must not be questioned under no circumstances and that ALL official narratives must be true.
That in itself is submissive in nature. How many people have been convicted for murder then released and pardoned many years later after DNA evidence proved they were innocent? Hundreds of people, yet no one questioned the narrative at the time did they? The JFKA is just another murder where the narrative can be questioned and is being questioned because the stakes are high, this is the 35th president of the United states and people have the right to ask questions.

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #6 on: Today at 12:43:34 PM »
Said the biggest nut case of them all!
Dadgum it, Martin, you beat me to it. The irony of the questions TG poses is almost beyond belief.

"I am not one of those goofy JFKA conspiracy theorists because the goofy conspiracy I posit subsumes not only the JFKA but pretty much the entire history of the United States for the past 75 years."

Oy.  ::)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?
« Reply #6 on: Today at 12:43:34 PM »