Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Mary Woodward said there were 3 shots and the 1st shot missed everything  (Read 3260 times)

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
    • SPMLaw
But it does make sense that JFK's transverse process was traumatized / damaged by CE-399 around Z-222, and that his spaying his elbows outward and "clutching" his throat was therefore a neuromuscular reaction, not an "attempt to breathe."
Maybe. Maybe not. We can be certain that the hole through JFK’ s airway was a major impediment to his ability to breathe properly.

We are less certain that he sustained a fracture of the T1 transverse process but if he did, there was no displacement of the bone. So how sure can we be that this was immediately felt? Since the T1 transverse process extends outside the spinal column and does not protect any nerves, it is even less certain that a non-displaced fracture of the end of that small bone would have resulted in any neurological reaction, let alone an immediate one.
« Last Edit: Today at 02:35:54 AM by Andrew Mason »

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
    • SPMLaw
You have proposed that JFK was hit by the first shot around Z193. Moving that shot 3 frames, 1/6 second, doesn't move that from absurd to reasonable.
I think you missed the point. My point had nothing to do with whether the first shot was at z190 or z193.  I was simply questioning how the HSCA could be arguing that the reaction of JFK at z226 could be a neuromuscular reaction to a wound that they found occurred 2 seconds earlier.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4139
I think you missed the point. My point had nothing to do with whether the first shot was at z190 or z193.  I was simply questioning how the HSCA could be arguing that the reaction of JFK at z226 could be a neuromuscular reaction to a wound that they found occurred 2 seconds earlier.

The HSCA should have disregarded the so-called "acoustical evidence" and the so-called "camera blur" evidence and concluded that JFK (and JBC) were both hit by the same bullet around Z-222.

Oh yeah, and that JFK reacted to being shot more quickly than JBC did.
« Last Edit: Today at 07:25:20 AM by Tom Graves »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
The HSCA should have disregarded the so-called "acoustical evidence" and the so-called "camera blur" evidence and concluded that JFK (and JBC) were both hit by the same bullet around Z-222.

Oh yeah, and that JFK reacted to being shot more quickly than JBC did.

Not true. JFK und JBC both flipped their arms upward at the same instant. Z226, less than 1/4 second after they were both struck.