We know where she was standing. That is made completely clear in the 2015 interview. The issue is why she wrote on the day of the JFKA that she was sitting and eating lunch on the thinly populated grassy knoll. And not only made that absurd error but compounded it by describing the shots as coming from behind and to her right. Her hearing problem tap dance doesn't explain how she got her location and circumstances so completely wrong. And this was a reporter for a major newspaper, no less.
Dear FPR,
Based on a close viewing of the Zapruder film, Woodward was wrong in her 11/23/63 article when she said that "the limo came to a near stop after the early backfire-like first shot (at "Z-124"?) that missed everything." (paraphrased)
As you know, the limo came to a near stop
after the Z-222-ish
second shot.
And she was wrong when she said JFK and Jackie waved to her and her colleagues
before said early backfire-like first shot that missed everything.
JFK waved to Westbrook and Co. between Z-175 and Z-190, i.e.,
after the early, backfire-like, missing-everything first shot.
Confirmation that Woodward's memory was correct when she wrote that both JFK and Jackie waved to her and her colleagues can be found by viewing the Zapruder film closely.
JFK waved to her and her colleagues between Z-175 and Z-190, and although Jackie's body and most of her head are blocked from our view in Z-180, we can discern that she's no longer looking far to her left at Robert Croft, but has turned her head towards Woodward and Co., so we can reasonably assume that she's waving to them, too.
Another mistake Woodward made was saying, in so many words, that the third-and-final shot occurred "rapidly" after the second (Z-222-ish) shot, when in fact it occurred about five seconds after it.
Bottom-line: If a reporter for a major newspaper like Mary Woodward can make so many critical mistakes just a few hours after the assassination, how can we trust any eyewitness / earwitness to that tragic event?
-- Tom