Things I don't care about

[Tom Graves]

[...]

Jefferson "Yuri Nosenko Was a True Defector" Morley's "JFK Facts" (sic).

Gag me with a KGB spoon.

[Michael T. Griffith]

I don't care about any of these items from just the first page of the forum topics:

Bart Kemp
Billy Lovelady
Pauline Sanders
Jeff Morley
CIA wallets
Babushka Lady

Why don't I care? Because none of the above had anything to do with the JFKA. They are all irrelevant distractions. I'm sure if I went back far enough, I could find dozens of other topics I don't care about. It amuses me how much people obsess about these topics. The phrase "barking up the wrong tree" comes to mind.

You left out two major things that you don't care about:

Facts
Objectivity

[John Corbett]

You left out two major things that you don't care about:

Facts
Objectivity

You are a stranger to both.

[Brian Doyle]

Why don't the "skeptics" ever attack the Prayer Man theory?...

Is it because some CT-ers are actually Agent Provocateurs trying to discredit the genuine CT community with crazy claims?...

[Tom Graves]

Why don't the "skeptics" ever attack the Prayer Man theory?...

Is it because some CT-ers are actually Agent Provocateurs trying to discredit the genuine CT community with crazy claims?...

There is no genuine CT community.

You're all a bunch of zombified-by-KGB disinformation, tinfoil-hat fantasists who psychologically need to believe (and preach) that Peter Dale Scott's evil, evil "Deep State" or Jimmy DiEugenio's evil, evil "National Security State" or Steve Bannon's evil, evil "Administrative State" killed JFK.

LOL!

[Lance Payette]

Why don't the "skeptics" ever attack the Prayer Man theory?...

Is it because some CT-ers are actually Agent Provocateurs trying to discredit the genuine CT community with crazy claims?...

History would suggest - the UFO field being one notable example - that governmental disinformation agents and cognitive infiltrators would be far more likely to be promoting self-evident wackiness like Prayer Man or Harvey and Lee than trying to defend and prop up the LN narrative. It's odd that CTers seemingly never grasp this reality.

I will confess, why the LN zealots feel compelled to zealously defend the LN narrative as though it were their religion is a mystery to me, but it certainly isn't because they have been recruited by the CIA; there may have been some of that in the early days, but not 62 years later. A wacky CTer would be a far more likely candidate. On the other hand, every area of weirdness including the JFKA is rife with true wackos whose true wackiness has nothing to do with being a disiniformation agent or cognitive infiltrator - so separating the faux crazies from the genuine ones poses a bit of a challenge.

This is why, I imagine, the LN zealots tend to be the ones suspected of being cognitive infiltrators; zealously defending the LN narrative isn't self-evidently wacky, but on the other hand identifying a motive for this level of zealotry is rather difficult. To pick on John C since he started this thread, he claims to be a devout LNer who finds all this CT stuff beneath him, yet he haunts the forum like almost no one else. Why? Maybe he's being paid to do so, ya think? Some of the CTers here would fit the more likely profile of a cognitive infiltrator - but maybe they're just genuine wackos, ya think? Yep, it's a challenge.

At the Ed Forum, I always thought the CIA could not invent a better cognitive infiltrator than Dr. Niederwacky - a licensed psychiatrist who nevertheless spouts jaw-dropping nonsense about almost every topic while accusing anyone who disagrees (including little old me, for God's sake) of being a cognitive infiltrator! He has almost single-handedly destroyed the Ed Forum. He probably isn't one, but that's what a cognitive infiltrator would look like.

[John Corbett]

History would suggest - the UFO field being one notable example - that governmental disinformation agents and cognitive infiltrators would be far more likely to be promoting self-evident wackiness like Prayer Man or Harvey and Lee than trying to defend and prop up the LN narrative. It's odd that CTers seemingly never grasp this reality.

I will confess, why the LN zealots feel compelled to zealously defend the LN narrative as though it were their religion is a mystery to me, but it certainly isn't because they have been recruited by the CIA; there may have been some of that in the early days, but not 62 years later. A wacky CTer would be a far more likely candidate. On the other hand, every area of weirdness including the JFKA is rife with true wackos whose true wackiness has nothing to do with being a disiniformation agent or cognitive infiltrator - so separating the faux crazies from the genuine ones poses a bit of a challenge.

This is why, I imagine, the LN zealots tend to be the ones suspected of being cognitive infiltrators; zealously defending the LN narrative isn't self-evidently wacky, but on the other hand identifying a motive for this level of zealotry is rather difficult. To pick on John C since he started this thread, he claims to be a devout LNer who finds all this CT stuff beneath him, yet he haunts the forum like almost no one else. Why? Maybe he's being paid to do so, ya think? Some of the CTers here would fit the more likely profile of a cognitive infiltrator - but maybe they're just genuine wackos, ya think? Yep, it's a challenge.

At the Ed Forum, I always thought the CIA could not invent a better cognitive infiltrator than Dr. Niederwacky - a licensed psychiatrist who nevertheless spouts jaw-dropping nonsense about almost every topic while accusing anyone who disagrees (including little old me, for God's sake) of being a cognitive infiltrator! He has almost single-handedly destroyed the Ed Forum. He probably isn't one, but that's what a cognitive infiltrator would look like.

Why would the CIA have ever cared what goes on in forums such as this. At their peaks these forums might have reached a few hundred people and now the regular participants number in the dozens. If people have been getting paid for posting pro-LN material, somebody owes me a shitload of back pay.