The Hole in the Limousine's Windshield: Proof of a Second Gunman

[Royell Storing]

When you saw those cracked windshield, did you have knowledge that somebody in the car had just been shot? If you did and you weren't in position to get a close-up view of the crack, I think you would have had a very different judgement. The human mind is subject to suggestion and the sight of a cracked windshield combined with the knowledge that JFK had just been shot would very much influence how those witnesses assessed what they were seeing.
The limo windshield issue should have been resolved a long time ago by the Secret Service's close up examination of the windshield which revealed a strike to the inside surface of the windshield and no penetration through the windshield.

   Yes, I have seen the SS Pics of "A" windshield. The images of the windshield I refer to were taken at Parkland Hospital, only minutes after the car arrived there, and only minutes after JFK had been removed from the vehicle. Now, put yourself in a jury box. Which images of the windshield are You going to place your trust in?

[John Corbett]

   Yes, I have seen the SS Pics of "A" windshield. The images of the windshield I refer to were taken at Parkland Hospital, only minutes after the car arrived there, and only minutes after JFK had been removed from the vehicle. Now, put yourself in a jury box. Which images of the windshield are You going to place your trust in?

If I'm in the jury box, I'd put my faith in whatever pictures were presented unless one side or another presented evidence the pictures were fabricated. Of course, if credible evidence of forgery was presented, the judge might rule the pictures inadmissible. I'm not a lawyer but my experience on four different juries tells me it's likely any objections one side or the other had to pictures presented by the other side would not be done in the presence of the jury. The judge would rule on admissibility BEFORE the jury was allowed to see them.