MW: True, but Bentley said it himself in his report to Chief Curry.
Did Bentley say that he engraved his initials on the gun at the same time as Hill, Carroll, Walker, and McDonald? No. You're assuming that all of the officers itnitalled the weapon at the same time, but there's nothing in the record that requires, implies, or suggests that this is the case.
MW: No, Hill's report doesn't imply anything of the kind. When you feel the need to make stuff up, you've already lost the argument!
Oh, but it does. You just won't let the sunshine into your mind. Carrol testified to the same thing:
Mr. BALL: And tell me briefly who was present when you saw McDonald make the mark on the gun?
Mr. CARROLL: Well, let's see - there was myself, Mack, I think Ray Hawkins was there, and I believe Hutson was there, and I believe Bentley and Lyons had already gone out to have their feet checked
MW: Btw, you still haven't provided an answer about Guy Rose and C.T. Walker.... Why is that?
Because you kept emphasizing Bentley, so that's what I responded to. Your Bentley angle has crashed and burned, so now you want to change the subject.
Did Bentley say that he engraved his initials on the gun at the same time as Hill, Carroll, Walker, and McDonald? No. You're assuming that all of the officers itnitalled the weapon at the same time, but there's nothing in the record that requires, implies, or suggests that this is the case. Moving the goalpost again? This is exactly the kind of BS that I have seen coming from you in previous conversations. Hill said he had the revolver all the time, until he handed it over to Lt Baker. Your suggestion that Bentley initialed the revolver before everybody else did is an assumption for which there is no evidence. It also doesn't make any sense!
Oh, but it does. You just won't let the sunshine into your mind. Carrol testified to the same thing:First you claim that Hill's testimony implied it (which it didn't) and now you come up with Carroll who only
believes that Bentley and Lyons had already left and doesn't even recall if Westbrook was there.
Wow, that's some solid "evidence"
The one good thing coming out of this is the fact that there also isn't a solid chain of custody for the wallet, just like there isn't one for the revolver, the gray jacket and CE 399.
Because you kept emphasizing Bentley, so that's what I responded to. Your Bentley angle has crashed and burned, so now you want to change the subject.Nope.. the question about Rose and Walker was already asked before you joined the conversation. The fact that you
don't understand ignored that shows exactly your strategy of talking about anything except the matter I wanted to discuss.
And my Bentley angle hasn't crashed and burned. You haven't even come close to making a coherent argument. All you are doing is cherry picking evidence and throwing it at the wall to see what sticks.
As for the original question, which directly relates to the existence of two wallets, you are still completely lost in the dark.
I said it before and I'll repeat it now; talking to you is a waste of time!