Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 11:29:24 PM
Why do people waste time pondering silly scenarios?
They can't help it.
Oh, the abject irony of two believers in the single-bullet theory (SBT) accusing others of "pondering silly scenarios"! This is like two Moon-landing deniers or two Holocaust deniers claiming that people who reject their theory are "pondering silly scenarios."
When it comes to the anomaly-replete JFK assassination, their paranoiac anti-"Deep State" / anti-"National Security State" / anti-"Administrative State" psyches demand it.
LOL! Gee, did the three members of the Warren Commission who rejected the SBT suffer from "paranoiac anti-"Deep State" / anti-"National Security State" / anti-"Administrative State" psyches"?! Mind you, two of those three members were Senator Richard Russell and Congressman Hale Boggs, who were staunch conservatives and were strongly pro-national security and pro-national defense.
It is genuinely amazing that you guys refuse to acknowledge the powerful, mutually corroborating evidence that the autopsy doctors determined for an absolute, observable fact that the back wound had no exit point. I don't know how in your own minds you brush aside this evidence and still cling to the SBT, especially given the fact that the hard physical evidence of JFK's tie and the holes in the back of JFK's coat and shirt prove the SBT is pure fantasy.
"JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible"
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MAgWA0frOLVeWY6ok9nzdrgpRN4Wv1AL/view?usp=sharing"Why JFK's Tie and Shirt Slits Destroy the Single-Bullet Theory"
https://sites.google.com/view/jfkshirtandtiedestroysbt/home“Research Notes on the Shored-Wound Theory to Explain JFK’s Throat Wound”
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h48FpT89KrC0rNrl4XC3MDePLDFEBBHb/view
