CIA Wallets at Tenth and Patton

[Bill Brown]

In this video of the wallet at the Tippit crime scene, the cop with the wallet is randomly waving his gun around, and without a care, even has it aimed close to the hand of the detective who is pointing something out within the wallet and then when the cop hands over the wallet, he quickly points the gun away and more towards himself.
The most likely scenario is that the wallet was being looked at legitimately and also as a bit of a show for the TV camera and thus the cop is a bit flippant with the direction of his gun, but when the civilian approaches and is given his wallet back, the cop responds correctly by diverting the aim of the gun and away from the direction of this civilian.



BTW, I posted this theory on the old Forum and Gary Mack who became a wise wizard, sent me a PM endorsing my theory.

JohnM

Bingo!  We have a winner.

[Martin Weidmann]

Not the wallet at the Tippit crime scene again? Yawn.

Why plant a wallet then refuse to use it as evidence?? This scenario doesn't make a lick of sense, well, not to any sane rational person.

JohnM

But a rational sane person would have understood by now that the wallet from the Tippit scene wasn't the one that was suppressed.

There is no chain of custody for the wallet Bentley took from Oswald in the car. It simply vanished.

Why did none of the officers in the car with Oswald mention (in any report) finding a Hidell ID in the wallet Bentley took from Oswald for the sole purpose to identify him?

Who was the unidentified officer who gave a wallet to Gus Rose and claimed it belonged to Oswald?

Gus Rose found the Hidell ID straight away, but Bentley overlooked it.... is that what we are supposed to believe?

[Martin Weidmann]

In this video of the wallet at the Tippit crime scene, the cop with the wallet is randomly waving his gun around, and without a care, even has it aimed close to the hand of the detective who is pointing something out within the wallet and then when the cop hands over the wallet, he quickly points the gun away and more towards himself.
The most likely scenario is that the wallet was being looked at legitimately and also as a bit of a show for the TV camera and thus the cop is a bit flippant with the direction of his gun, but when the civilian approaches and is given his wallet back, the cop responds correctly by diverting the aim of the gun and away from the direction of this civilian.



BTW, I posted this theory on the old Forum and Gary Mack who became a wise wizard, sent me a PM endorsing my theory.

JohnM

Not this same BS again!

You are guessing and completely ignoring that Barrett said it was a wallet that had ID's of Oswald and Hidell in it.

This is classic LN crap. Not accepting anything that doesn't fit with the narrative and come up with all sorts of wacky excuses to muddy the water.