CIA Wallets at Tenth and Patton

[Richard Smith]

Garbage. They would have said that.

That's bizarre logic.  Did "they" say it was Oswald's wallet and they were involved in a conspiracy to plant evidence?  It is truly comedy gold that CTers who otherwise reject all evidence linking Oswald to the crime insist that his wallet was left at the Tippit murder scene and that the same investigators who are involved in framing him suppress this highly incriminating piece of evidence.  It's mind blowing.

[Michael Capasse]

Did "they" say it was Oswald's wallet....

  As a matter of fact one cop did;
https://jfk.boards.net/post/4553

"First on the scene recovered Oswald's wallet there too."
" K H Croy Sgt. Kenneth Croy DPD Reservve #86"(?)

[Martin Weidmann]

"It has been established" because someone said it was so!  Wow.  Imagine applying that standard to the other evidence that links Oswald to the assassination.  Most of which you reject. How about spinning us a yarn that explains why the folks who are involved in framing Oswald suppress a highly incriminating piece of evidence left at the murder scene?

Interesting that you ignored the fact that Barrett said it was a wallet.

why the folks who are involved in framing Oswald suppress a highly incriminating piece of evidence left at the murder scene?

You keep repeating this BS when you've already been told that nobody claims that a wallet found at a murder scene was suppressed.

If a wallet was suppressed it was the one taken from Oswald in the car by Bentley.