JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
CIA Wallets at Tenth and Patton
Richard Smith:
Most likely it's Tippit's citation book. A logical thing for the investigators to do is look through it to see if perhaps he wrote down the name or license plate number before being shot. It makes no sense for the conspirators to suppress a wallet they planted at the crime the scene to frame Oswald. It also makes no sense for the police to suppress an Oswald wallet left at the scene where it would be highly incriminating and instead claim it was found during his arrest. The double wallet explanation for suppressing any crime scene wallet makes no sense because the conspirators should have anticipated that Oswald would have his wallet when arrested or killed. They would have to be baked into the plan.
Michael Capasse:
--- Quote from: Richard Smith on Today at 01:25:45 PM ---Most likely it's Tippit's citation book.
--- End quote ---
Garbage. They would have said that.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Richard Smith on Today at 01:25:45 PM ---Most likely it's Tippit's citation book. A logical thing for the investigators to do is look through it to see if perhaps he wrote down the name or license plate number before being shot. It makes no sense for the conspirators to suppress a wallet they planted at the crime the scene to frame Oswald. It also makes no sense for the police to suppress an Oswald wallet left at the scene where it would be highly incriminating and instead claim it was found during his arrest. The double wallet explanation for suppressing any crime scene wallet makes no sense because the conspirators should have anticipated that Oswald would have his wallet when arrested or killed. They would have to be baked into the plan.
--- End quote ---
Most likely it's Tippit's citation book.
It has been established some time ago that it isn't. Besides Barrett said it was a wallet!
It makes no sense for the conspirators to suppress a wallet they planted at the crime the scene to frame Oswald.
That would indeed make no sense, but nobody is suggesting that is what happened.
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on Today at 02:46:16 PM ---Most likely it's Tippit's citation book.
It has been established some time ago that it isn't. Besides Barrett said it was a wallet!
It makes no sense for the conspirators to suppress a wallet they planted at the crime the scene to frame Oswald.
That would indeed make no sense, but nobody is suggesting that is what happened.
--- End quote ---
"It has been established" because someone said it was so! Wow. Imagine applying that standard to the other evidence that links Oswald to the assassination. Most of which you reject. How about spinning us a yarn that explains why the folks who are involved in framing Oswald suppress a highly incriminating piece of evidence left at the murder scene?
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: Michael Capasse on Today at 02:42:20 PM ---Garbage. They would have said that.
--- End quote ---
That's bizarre logic. Did "they" say it was Oswald's wallet and they were involved in a conspiracy to plant evidence? It is truly comedy gold that CTers who otherwise reject all evidence linking Oswald to the crime insist that his wallet was left at the Tippit murder scene and that the same investigators who are involved in framing him suppress this highly incriminating piece of evidence. It's mind blowing.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version