JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
What five anomalies have complicated the investigation over the years?
Steve M. Galbraith:
A bullet tumbling backwards.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on June 16, 2026, 06:59:50 PM ---You answered a question with a question. I'll try a third time.
Do you deny that a Carcano bullet will tumble when exiting soft tissue?
--- End quote ---
YOU claimed the Pristine Bullet was traveling "BACKWARD". And now you are trying to run away from that. I'm holding you to what YOU said.
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on June 16, 2026, 10:42:51 PM --- YOU claimed the Pristine Bullet was traveling "BACKWARD". And now you are trying to run away from that. I'm holding you to what YOU said.
--- End quote ---
Yes it was traveling backwards after it had tumbled 180 degrees. IOW, the base was out front and the nose of the bullet was trailing. I guess it's my fault for not dumbing down the explanation enough so you could understand but Stephen Galbrath tried to help you out with a picture of a tumbling bullet but even that doesn't seem to have sunk in. I don't know what else we can do to help you out.
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on June 16, 2026, 10:42:51 PM --- YOU claimed the Pristine Bullet was traveling "BACKWARD". And now you are trying to run away from that. I'm holding you to what YOU said.
--- End quote ---
To be fair, I think what was being suggested that the bullet was tumbling (rotating about its transverse axis) and, therefore, travelling backward for just an instant in time every rotation. If a pristine bullet is tumbling, it would have to have become unstable while passing through air. The MC FMJ bullets did not do that in passing through a few hundred feet of air. I don't see anyone suggesting that a pristine bullet was tumbling. You said it was being suggested but I don't see where anyone else argued that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version