JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Reasonable Doubts?
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Dan O'meara on June 14, 2026, 05:18:10 PM ---
How could the bullet "tumbling" [ ::)] and leave such a small hole in JBC's jacket?
This small hole is indicative of a non-rotating bullet.
--- End quote ---
Or a bullet that had tumbled 180 degrees.
--- Quote ---
If the bullet was rotating, how could it enter both his wrist and his leg backwards?
--- End quote ---
Striking the wrist bone could affect the rotation of the bullet.
--- Quote ---
Why is there zero evidence of a bullet hole in JBC's wristbone? The bone shattered but there was no hole through which a bullet could pass, rotating or not.
--- End quote ---
When did I say the bullet went through the wrist bone?
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on June 14, 2026, 05:14:27 PM ---Yes, it was traveling backward because that is the only way the lead core could have struck JBC's wrist and deposited the lead fragments there. That is also the only way the base gets flattened as opposed to the nose.
Ballistic gel tests show that a Carcano bullet will start tumbling after exiting from soft tissue which is all CE399 did when it passed through JFK's torso.
--- End quote ---
A "Pristine" bullet breaking bones and traveling backward? :D That only happens in the "Looney Tunes". And this in the face of SA Landis finding a bullet in the BACK Seat area of the JFK Limo, which would tie to the shallow JFK BACK Wound?
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on June 14, 2026, 05:30:08 PM --- A "Pristine" bullet breaking bones and traveling backward? :D That only happens in the "Looney Tunes". And this in the face of SA Landis finding a bullet in the BACK Seat area of the JFK Limo, which would tie to the shallow JFK BACK Wound?
--- End quote ---
The Haag team used sophisticated experiments to show that a Carcano bullet will tumble when exiting soft tissue. You can ignore that if you choose but that doesn't change the fact.
Landis' statement is highly dubious given that there is no record of him saying that during the first six decades following the assassination. Picking up such an important piece of evidence and then just casually setting it down would have been an incredibly stupid thing for him to have done. This screams "false memory" which is a documented phenomenon
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on June 14, 2026, 05:19:41 PM ---That isn't an "if".
--- End quote ---
Funny how the WC thought it was.
--- Quote ---None of the above "ifs" are mine. You inserted them.
--- End quote ---
That’s right. You refuse to acknowledge even a possibility that 85+ witnesses might have actually observed what they said they observed.
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on June 14, 2026, 05:26:03 PM ---Or a bullet that had tumbled 180 degrees.
Striking the wrist bone could affect the rotation of the bullet.
When did I say the bullet went through the wrist bone?
--- End quote ---
Ok. So in what non-Newtonian universe does an object impact something hard, not penetrate it, and continue around it rather than deflecting away from it?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version