William Niedernut and Low Follies at Education Forum-JFKA

[Michael T. Griffith]

MTG:

Verily, Mossad perped the JFKA. Even Jeff Morley dog-whistled as much of Tucker Carlson's show.

I know. It's just crazy. And embarrassing.

Something ugly is happening on America's left-wing. You see Hasan Piker. The justifications for murdering healthcare industry executives, or Charlie Kirk.

I agree that elements of America's left wing are becoming deranged and extreme. No doubt about it. I think this is also happening to elements of America's right wing, though not to the degree that it's happening to the left wing.

The IRGC gets a pass; no one cares about 40k slaughtered in the streets of Iran.

Indeed. The radical left also gives a pass to Hamas and Hezbollah, ignoring the thousands of people they have murdered (and not just Israelis but also some Muslims who've refused to support jihad).

The exoneration and valorization of Sirhan Sirhan, and the accusations against Mossad, in the RFKA and JFKA.

I, too, reject as absurd the accusations against the Mossad, but I don't believe that Sirhan killed RFK. He was never in position to fire from point-blank range into the back of RFK's head. Acoustical evidence shows that more shots were fired in the pantry than Sirhan's gun could have fired. However, I do not view Sirhan as a noble figure by any means. At the time, he was virulently anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic.

[John Corbett]

I, too, reject as absurd the accusations against the Mossad, but I don't believe that Sirhan killed RFK. He was never in position to fire from point-blank range into the back of RFK's head.

Do RFK CTs ever ask themselves one simple question. Did the eyewitnesses who said Sirhan was never close enough to fire a point-blank shot into the back of RFK's head see another gunman in position to fire a point-blank shot into the back of RFK's head? If the answer to that question is "no", then it follows that those witnesses did not see the shot that was fired point-blank into the back of RFK's head. So how do those witnesses establish that it was NOT Sirhan who fired that shot if they did not see that shot fired?

[Benjamin Cole]

MTG-

As usual, in chaotic situations, there are eyewitnesses and other eyewitnesses.

However, three eyewitnesses place Sirhan close enough to RFK for the fatal shot, and Coroner Noguchi's estimates of the gunshot distance are only that, estimates.

Sirhan said that RFK turned suddenly away when he (Sirhan) put his gun towards RFK's face. So that explains the shot to the rear of RFK's head.

In addition, witnesses described all gun shot reports as the same in pitch and volume---in other words, all shots sounded as if they were the same, from Sirhan's .22 or an identical .22.

This tends to rule out the idea that RFK was shot from behind by security guard Eugene Thane Cesar, who was armed with a .38. BTW, Cesar's connections to the "Deep State" are non-existent.

That said, Larry Hancock and John Hunt did careful work (see Hunt's book), and concluded that more than eight shots were fired that night in the Ambassador.

It is risible Sirhan was hypnotized, although he may have been deranged, and put himself into a state or stupor.

Sirhan was a loveless, nearly penniless, diminutive, baleful anti-Semitic crackpot, who murdered RFK for the Senator's support of Israel, and said so many times.

I open to the idea Sirhan's brother, a Palestinian extremist who bought the .22 handgun for Sirhan, could have also fired some shots that night. There were many reports of someone who looked a lot like Sirhan at the Ambassador.

The LA DA wanted a prosecutable case, and went with the LN narrative.