A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys

[Lance Payette]

      Your limited JFK Assassination knowledge prevents you from connecting dots. You immediately get confused. You have never looked at the Wiegman Film vs the Couch & Darnell Films. Same goes for examining DPD Motorcycle Officer Haygood on the Cancellare Photo vs The Bogus Motorcycle Cop on the Darnell Film. You're mentally limited due to a linear thought process.

Royell is officially coming unglued. Not doing yourself any favors with this sort of stuff, Royell. I have a soft spot for wackos, but you're pushing the limits. Oh, a "linear thought process" is "a systematic, step-by-step cognitive method where ideas follow a logical sequence." It's also called rationality.

[Royell Storing]

     In order for your claimed DPD "release" of this car, the car had to of been "claimed". And of course, "paperwork" would then be involved. I would be interested in seeing your evidence that any of this happened.
     Continuing to research the JFK Assassination is mandatory. That is of course unless you enjoy continually having to take "back water".

               BUMP

[Royell Storing]

While recently watching “Hypnotic Eye”, a 1960 horror film I saw what looks like a possible fit for the Nat Geo “island” car. The 1959 Ford Fairlane Galaxy 500 has a body length of 17.5’. I’m not a car guy so more experienced car enthusiasts could have a better identification.  Anyway, I modeled my highly acclaimed “Lego Car” with a 17.5’ length and positioned it in my 3D model using a Robert Hughes frame of the doorway that shows the nose of the car. When viewing from a Wiegman position it is obvious the 17.5’ length extends about 5-6’ to the west of the black suited man. This is what Royell has stated in his postings. I had to shorten the test car to just under 12’ length to completely mask it with the black suit guy.
Edit to change model from 1958 to 1959

   As we see above, my friend "The Nutty Professor" has proven the "getaway" car is Not on the Wiegman Film. This means the car was traveling down the Elm St Extension while the Kill Shot was being fired. And then the car parked alongside the Island, across from the "wide open" Huge Gates, for at least 3+ hours after the Kill Shot. It became an abandoned "getaway" car. And Image Evidence shows DPD was all over that car. 

[John Corbett]

   As we see above, my friend "The Nutty Professor" has proven the "getaway" car is Not on the Wiegman Film. This means the car was traveling down the Elm St Extension while the Kill Shot was being fired. And then the car parked alongside the Island, across from the "wide open" Huge Gates, for at least 3+ hours after the Kill Shot. It became an abandoned "getaway" car. And Image Evidence shows DPD was all over that car.

You still have given us nothing but your assumption that the car in question was a getaway car.

[Royell Storing]

You still have given us nothing but your assumption that the car in question was a getaway car.

   YOU Claimed this car was "RELEASED" by DPD. Are you standing by YOUR DECLARATION? If DPD did formally "RELEASE" this car, there should be paperwork connected to this alleged "RELEASE". That RELEASE would include a license plate # and name(s) attached to the car. So, are YOU also claiming there was/is DPD paperwork directly connected to this car?
   This car: (1) Was traveling down the Elm St Extension while the Kill Shot was being fired, (2) Parked inside a clearly posted, "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone alongside the Island, (3) Back from the corner and unable to be seen from Elm St, (4) Across from the "wide open" Huge Gates which granted access/exit to the TSBD, (5) Was rendered Immobile by DPD, (6) Had a DPD Cop guarding it, and (7) Then sat there for at least 3+ Hours. I believe the covert actions and ultimate parked position of this car overwhelmingly proves it was an intended "getaway" car. Obviously, DPD thought the very same thing. DPD was all over this car both short and long term.   

[John Corbett]

   YOU Claimed this car was "RELEASED" by DPD. Are you standing by YOUR DECLARATION? If DPD did formally "RELEASE" this car, there should be paperwork connected to this alleged "RELEASE". That RELEASE would include a license plate # and name(s) attached to the car. So, are YOU also claiming there was/is DPD paperwork directly connected to this car?
   This car: (1) Was traveling down the Elm St Extension while the Kill Shot was being fired, (2) Parked inside a clearly posted, "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone alongside the Island, (3) Back from the corner and unable to be seen from Elm St, (4) Across from the "wide open" Huge Gates which granted access/exit to the TSBD, (5) Was rendered Immobile by DPD, (6) Had a DPD Cop guarding it, and (7) Then sat there for at least 3+ Hours. I believe the covert actions and ultimate parked position of this car overwhelmingly proves it was an intended "getaway" car. Obviously, DPD thought the very same thing. DPD was all over this car both short and long term.

Really? What is your evidence the DPD "was all over this car" in the long term? For that matter, what is your evidence they were all over it in the short term? What is your evidence the car had been immobilized? What is your evidence that a cop was guarding this car with a shotgun. I have seen plenty of footage and still pictures of cops with shotguns surrounding the TSBD following the shooting. Just because one of these cops might have been  standing near this car with a shotgun is not evidence he was guarding the car. So far you have produced not evidence the car was immobilized by the DPD or had any interest in it. All we have are your unsubstantiated claims.

As is your usual practice, you have tried to shift the burden to move of proving the car was NOT a getaway car. You have completely failed in your efforts to prove this car WAS a getaway car. As usual, your claims are pure assumptions on your part with no supporting evidence.