Video: The Boom Click Click Boom Click Click Boom Click Click Guy

[John Corbett]

JC  “The three shot scenario is supported by the consensus of earwitnesses AND the three spent shells.”

The three shot narrative does not work at all in any scenario. That is why Holland and Meyers created a shot with absolutely no evidence associated with it and still decided it was better than the alternative. You know Andrew Mason. Didn't they ever inform you of this important piece of information?

Amazing though, this post sounds so profound and professional, unfortunately the reality is it is all about you advancing an early missed shot narrative that does not work and a complete lack of evidence supporting it.

No three shells does not mean three shots. All the evidence points to two shots. Even the shells.  Not one of your witnesses stated there was an early missed shot. Max Hollandand and Dale Meyers both knew this when the theory was first proposed. Why do you think it became necessary to have a child running down a sidewalk as proof, with not a single adult anywhere supporting the early missed shot.

There is no difference between you and Andrew. He was supposedly just following the evidence too. You both followed it into a dead end alley. At least Andrew is trying to make sense of the information as opposed to an early missed shot. No evidence supports it. Holland and Meyers knew that why don't you?

You have predetermined that the early missed shot was correct without any evidence. Everything else is just pretending you are somehow unbiased but in reality, you are looking for anything that supports your personal belief. Just like Holland and Meyers. Holland eventually proved to himself that he was wrong and Meyers focused on SBT.

You have decided the earwitnesses are correct and in turn somehow bolster this early missed shot nonsense. They do not. The eyewitnesses state where the first shot took place in relationship to where they were standing and what JFK’s reaction was to the shot. That is real life evidence. But go ahead and go with a child's actions, so much better.

So you believe witnesses can accurately say where the limo was when they heard the first shot but can't count to three. Amazing.

The three shot scenario conforms perfectly with the Z-film, the consensus of the witnesses in Dealy Plaza, the 3 spent shells in the sniper's nest, and JBC's recollection that he heard a shot before the one which hit him in the back. If you want to believe JBC just imagined he heard an early shot before the one which struck him, that's your privilege. Just don't expect the rest of us to believe that nonsense.

[John Corbett]

......................You are likely thinking of the 2013 nonfiction book, Phantom Shot: Eyewitnesses Solve The JFK Assassination by Mike Majerus and Jack Nessan.
The book claims that only two shots were fired that day (both by Lee Harvey Oswald), meticulously analyzing ignored eyewitness statements to argue that a "third shot" or a second gunman is a phantom created by early media errors................

Synopsis
For more than half a century, the JFK assassination has been shrouded in mystery. Many have been blamed, including the CIA, the Secret Service, Fidel Castro, the Russians, the mafia, right-wing extremists, and Lyndon Johnson. The true facts have been buried for decades beneath layers of distortions and misinformation. The solution to the assassination has always been right under our noses, hidden in plain sight. The key lies in the number of shots fired. The two official U.S. government investigations came to different conclusions on this issue, and both got it wrong. In the fog of war, the press got it wrong too, beginning with the first bulletin sent out over the wires just minutes after the shooting. A consensus groupthink soon emerged that did not reflect what really happened in Dallas. Nonstop reporting of inaccurate information actually caused witnesses to change their stories about what they really saw and heard that day. Phantom Shot analyzes the statements of key eyewitnesses, some of which were recorded just minutes after the shooting, before groupthink set in. Many of these witnesses were ignored by the government investigations. Their statements unravel the mystery of the assassination once and for all. Phantom Shot answers these questions and many more: How many shots were really fired? Was there a shot from the grassy knoll? Was Oswald the sole assassin? Was he part of a conspiracy? Was Jack Ruby sent by the mob to silence him? Did J. Edgar Hoover and others in the FBI know the solution to the assassination in 1964 and cover it up? Why did the Warren Commission ignore the statements of key eyewitnesses?, For more than half a century, the JFK assassination has been shrouded in mystery. Many have been blamed, including the CIA, the Secret Service, Fidel Castro, the Russians, the mafia, right-wing extremists, and Lyndon Johnson. The true facts have been buried for decades beneath layers of distortions and misinformation.The solution to the assassination has always been right under our noses, hidden in plain sight. The key lies in the number of shots fired. The two official U.S. government investigations came to different conclusions on this issue, and both got it wrong. In the fog of war, the press got it wrong too, beginning with the first bulletin sent out over the wires just minutes after the shooting. A consensus groupthink soon emerged that did not reflect what really happened in Dallas. Nonstop reporting of inaccurate information actually caused witnesses to change their stories about what they really saw and heard that day.Phantom Shot analyzes the statements of key eyewitnesses, some of which were recorded just minutes after the shooting, before groupthink set in. Many of these witnesses were ignored by the government investigations. Their statements unravel the mystery of the assassination once and for all.Phantom Shot answers these questions and many more: How many shots were really fired? Was there a shot from the grassy knoll? Was Oswald the sole assassin? Was he part of a conspiracy? Was Jack Ruby sent by the mob to silence him? Did J. Edgar Hoover and others in the FBI know the solution to the assassination in 1964 and cover it up? Why did the Warren Commission ignore the statements of key eyewitnesses?..............

There is no mystery to the JFK assassination. The facts have not been buried. They have been available to the public since the publication of the WCR. Those who choose not to believe it are only creating confusion rather than accept clarity.

[Jack Nessan]

So you believe witnesses can accurately say where the limo was when they heard the first shot but can't count to three. Amazing.

The three shot scenario conforms perfectly with the Z-film, the consensus of the witnesses in Dealy Plaza, the 3 spent shells in the sniper's nest, and JBC's recollection that he heard a shot before the one which hit him in the back. If you want to believe JBC just imagined he heard an early shot before the one which struck him, that's your privilege. Just don't expect the rest of us to believe that nonsense.

So you believe witnesses can accurately say where the limo was when they heard the first shot but can't count to three. Amazing.

Your stating the eyewitnesses heard just two shots and they are supposed to state they heard three?  Good point, that would indicate your proposing “medias influence.”

The three shot scenario conforms perfectly with the Z-film, the consensus of the witnesses in Dealy Plaza, the 3 spent shells in the sniper's nest, and JBC's recollection that he heard a shot before the one which hit him in the back. If you want to believe JBC just imagined he heard an early shot before the one which struck him, that's your privilege. Just don't expect the rest of us to believe that nonsense.

Actually, it doesn't. This is not just a three shot scenario. You have been proposing a three shot scenario with an early missed shot at Z160. You have not provided a single witness to this fantasy shot. So much for evidence supporting what only you see in the Zapruder Film. JBC is not twisting and turning and straining to see behind him at that point in time. JBC continues to engage the crowd the same as JFK.

Holland and Meyers understood there was no evidence of a shot. Unless you are thinking a small child running on the side walk and reacting to an imaginary shot that no adult heard is all the evidence you need.

The consensus of the “earwitnesses” was stating there were three shots but that is not what the eyewitnesses stated. The consensus of the eyewitnesses was there was only two shots. The belief that JBC heard an earlier shot is your fantasy. He never stated that. He saw JFK slumped after the first shot. 

There is other three shot narratives, maybe try one of those out and see if it makes more sense. A theory without a single witness to support it is not much of a theory. Ask Andrew maybe he has a spare one he has not used in a while.

[John Corbett]

So you believe witnesses can accurately say where the limo was when they heard the first shot but can't count to three. Amazing.

Your stating the eyewitnesses heard just two shots and they are supposed to state they heard three?  Good point, that would indicate your proposing “medias influence.”

The three shot scenario conforms perfectly with the Z-film, the consensus of the witnesses in Dealy Plaza, the 3 spent shells in the sniper's nest, and JBC's recollection that he heard a shot before the one which hit him in the back. If you want to believe JBC just imagined he heard an early shot before the one which struck him, that's your privilege. Just don't expect the rest of us to believe that nonsense.

Actually, it doesn't. This is not just a three shot scenario. You have been proposing a three shot scenario with an early missed shot at Z160. You have not provided a single witness to this fantasy shot.

JBC is a witness. Agent Bennet is a witness. Bonnie Ray Williams is a witness. Harold Norman is a witness. Junior Jarman is a witness. I guess you're right. I haven't provided a SINGLE witness to an early shot.

So much for evidence supporting what only you see in the Zapruder Film.

Do you really think I am the only proponent of a three shot, first shot miss scenario. I have news for you. You are the outlier here.

JBC is not twisting and turning and straining to see behind him at that point in time. JBC continues to engage the crowd the same as JFK.

You seem to be addressing a comment I made in an earlier post so I have no idea what the context is for what you are talking about.

Holland and Meyers understood there was no evidence of a shot. Unless you are thinking a small child running on the side walk and reacting to an imaginary shot that no adult heard is all the evidence you need.

The consensus of the “earwitnesses” was stating there were three shots but that is not what the eyewitnesses stated. The consensus of the eyewitnesses was there was only two shots. The belief that JBC heard an earlier shot is your fantasy. He never stated that. He saw JFK slumped after the first shot. 

There is other three shot narratives, maybe try one of those out and see if it makes more sense. A theory without a single witness to support it is not much of a theory. Ask Andrew maybe he has a spare one he has not used in a while.

Now you are just resorting to BS. There was a clear consensus of the witnesses that there were 3 shots. The WC said so in their report.