Video: The Boom Click Click Boom Click Click Boom Click Click Guy

[John Corbett]

Why do you insist traumatic incidents turn people into vegetables. By this line of thought everyone would be like fainting goats. More likely it would have been seared into their memories.

 Jackie, Nelly, JBC, corroborated each other's testimonies in addition to the shell info, ballistic info and 70+ eyewitnesses.

An early missed shot is basically a child ran down the side walk.

Eyewitness testimony is a problem but not the earwitnesses? Really? 

You have the two shots right, but like a baby sucking their thumb, you seem to need an unsupported third shot that no one in Dealey Plaza was aware of ever having taken pace including the guy filming the motorcade.

Why do you insist on creating strawman arguments. I never said what you claim I did. Therefore, there is no need to address the rest of your tripe.

[Jack Nessan]

Why do you insist on creating strawman arguments. I never said what you claim I did. Therefore, there is no need to address the rest of your tripe.

No, a strawman argument is not right. You definitely favor the earwitnesses. You argue against two shots making you a three shot proponent. The eyewitnesses are predominantly two shots, basically the first shot struck JFK, the second shot was then headshot with some stating a shot after the headshot. 

The three shot witnesses were predominantly earwitnesses. There is not a single piece of physical evidence; bullets, shells, medical, trajectory, indicating there were three shots. That just leaves earwitnesses as the source of your storyline. If the earwitnesses had stated there were four shots then you would be scouring the Zapruder Film for a fourth shot. Maybe another child running on the sidewalk.