Lee Harvey Oswald's and the KGB's mind-blowing synchronicity (pardon the pun)

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lee Harvey Oswald's and the KGB's mind-blowing synchronicity (pardon the pun)  (Read 1088 times)

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
TG--

You are the one positing Solie conspiratorially and covertly communicated with LHO somehow, whether directly or through clandestine "cut outs."

Do you have any evidence of such communiques?


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
TG--

You are the one positing Solie conspiratorially and covertly communicated with LHO somehow, whether directly or through clandestine "cut outs."

Do you have any evidence of such communiques?

Dear "BC,"

Can you please tell me why someone in the Office of Security's mole-hunting Security Research Staff (of which Nosenko-loving / Shadrin-losing Solie was Deputy Chief) arranged with the Records Integration Division and the Office of Mail Logistics to have all of the incoming non-CIA cables on Oswald's upcoming October 1959 "defection" in Moscow sent to it instead of where they would normally go -- the Soviet Russia Division? And why they disappeared into a "black hole" there for at least six weeks -- with the most alarming ones -- the ones that reported Oswald's threatening to Consul Snyder and the hidden KGB microphones to commit U-2 espionage against the U.S. -- didn't resurface until after the assassination of JFK?

Thanks!

-- "TG"
« Last Edit: May 09, 2026, 03:05:11 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Can you please tell me why someone in the Office of Security's mole-hunting Security Research Staff (of which Nosenko-loving and Shadrin-losing Solie was Deputy Chief) arranged with the Records Integration Division and the Office of Mail Logistics to have all of the incoming non-CIA cables on Oswald's upcoming "defection" sent to it instead of where they would normally go -- the Soviet Russia Division?--TG

I do not have any theories, conjecture, hypotheses or deductions on that.

The WC concluded LHO was not KGB or G2. If WC conclusions are fallible...then where are we in our JFKA narratives?

If Solie was in fact a KGB mole, then he had his reasons for manipulating information traffic, as he was working for the evil and bad KGB.

If Solie was in fact an earnest mole-hunter, he may have other reasons for cutting off the flow of non-CIA cables to SRD. Perhaps to find out if someone in SRD was finding out the censored info anyway---indicating that someone could be KGB.

The case against Solie is interesting.

On the other hand, the case is only a deduction, a conspiracy theory on Solie.

There is no evidence of Solie-KGB communiques, and LHO never said, "Someone representing Solie (or even the CIA) sent me to the USSR." Solie was soft on Nosenko, but so were some others.

I lean towards Solie being a KGB asset, but it is a suspicion.

There has been no trial, and Solie is not around to defend his reputation.

Maybe.



 

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
Can you please tell me why someone in the Office of Security's mole-hunting Security Research Staff (of which Nosenko-loving and Shadrin-losing Solie was Deputy Chief) arranged with the Records Integration Division and the Office of Mail Logistics to have all of the incoming non-CIA cables on Oswald's upcoming "defection" sent to it instead of where they would normally go -- the Soviet Russia Division?--TG

I do not have any theories, conjecture, hypotheses or deductions on that.

The WC concluded LHO was not KGB or G2. If WC conclusions are fallible...then where are we in our JFKA narratives?

If Solie was in fact a KGB mole, then he had his reasons for manipulating information traffic, as he was working for the evil and bad KGB.

If Solie was in fact an earnest mole-hunter, he may have other reasons for cutting off the flow of non-CIA cables to SRD. Perhaps to find out if someone in SRD was finding out the censored info anyway---indicating that someone could be KGB.

The case against Solie is interesting.

On the other hand, the case is only a deduction, a conspiracy theory on Solie.

There is no evidence of Solie-KGB communiques, and LHO never said, "Someone representing Solie (or even the CIA) sent me to the USSR." Solie was soft on Nosenko, but so were some others.

I lean towards Solie being a KGB asset, but it is a suspicion.

There has been no trial, and Solie is not around to defend his reputation.

Maybe.

It's funny that you, yourself, have preached that Solie was a KGB mole.

Now tell me what you know about Leonard V. McCoy and Russia-born George Kisevalter.
« Last Edit: May 09, 2026, 03:12:10 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Darragh McConville

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 3
I'm just sharing Richard Lipsey's witness statement to the HSCA for visibility - https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/med_testimony/Lipsey_1-18-78/HSCA-Lipsey.htm

The specific section, where he is quite specific, reads:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Could you describe for us the nature of the damage to the front of the neck?

 
LIPSEY: No. I really couldn't. Because like I say, when we got it out, there was -- blood was all over the body. It was almost caked on. I remember they took a scrub brush and a pail. One of his arms, and if I've not mistaken, it was his left arm. You know, the way, I guess, after he died, finished the autopsy by that time and, rigor mortis had set in and one of his arms was slightly higher. Well, the guy's laying down and one of them was up a little bit. So when they started the autopsy I can remember, one of the doctors, when he was starting to clean the body up, got up on the table and physically got up on the table and put his knee down on his arm to hold it down -- to get it out of his way -- so he could scrub the rest of the body. So to say, to describe the hole to you, no. Because it was so messy and so much blood that I didn't, I never got close enough to get down and look at the wound itself.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
I'm just sharing Richard Lipsey's witness statement to the HSCA for visibility - https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/med_testimony/Lipsey_1-18-78/HSCA-Lipsey.htm

The specific section, where he is quite specific, reads:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Could you describe for us the nature of the damage to the front of the neck?

 
LIPSEY: No. I really couldn't. Because like I say, when we got it out, there was -- blood was all over the body. It was almost caked on. I remember they took a scrub brush and a pail. One of his arms, and if I've not mistaken, it was his left arm. You know, the way, I guess, after he died, finished the autopsy by that time and, rigor mortis had set in and one of his arms was slightly higher. Well, the guy's laying down and one of them was up a little bit. So when they started the autopsy I can remember, one of the doctors, when he was starting to clean the body up, got up on the table and physically got up on the table and put his knee down on his arm to hold it down -- to get it out of his way -- so he could scrub the rest of the body. So to say, to describe the hole to you, no. Because it was so messy and so much blood that I didn't, I never got close enough to get down and look at the wound itself.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wrong thread.

Thanks for the bump, though.

Online Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
Was Oswald a double agent ?