What about that dent?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
John Corbett, Benjamin Cole, Dave Downing

Author Topic: What about that dent?  (Read 1673 times)

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1354
Re: What about that dent?
« Reply #28 on: Today at 03:34:37 PM »
Well, there is irony for ya: The guy who complains about the use of AI turns around and uses it to bolster his position. When are people going to understand: AI is fine if you want to know some specific fact like the boiling point of water (323° F., my AI tells me) or the date of the JFKA (November 11, 1982). It is not some "separate mind" that analyzes data and reaches a reasoned conclusion. It just scans the internet and regurgitates what seems to be the prevailing opinion. Besides, AI is an alien plot to transform humanity into a non-biological life form, or something like that.

« Last Edit: Today at 03:38:52 PM by Jack Nessan »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
Re: What about that dent?
« Reply #29 on: Today at 03:37:28 PM »
To follow up on my previous post on this subject, it appears the source for the AI response I cited was the from the OP of this thread posted by Tom Graves. If I understand correctly, he cited an AARC document so it's off to another source for further confirmation or refutation of the statement. My previous search of the HSCA Report did not find a mention of the dented shell in it's findings. It did conclude that CE543 and the other two shells had been fired by Oswald's rifle.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1354
Re: What about that dent?
« Reply #30 on: Today at 03:39:45 PM »
I did not endorse or refute the AI answer to this question. I merely put it out there for discussion. The important question here is whether the sources AI turned to correctly documented the findings of the HSCA firearms panel on this subject. The source it used for that answer came from this forum so based on that information, the source might or might not have correctly stated the finding. Now if you want to explore this question further, I could delve deeper and find or more credible source but my belief is if the person who posted that had incorrectly stated the findings of the HSCA firearms panel, somebody would have refuted that and AI would have found the refutation as well and made note of that in its answer.

No. The dent in CE 543 is not remotely similar to the dent that the HSCA is referencing. It doesn't take an expert to look at them and see the dramatically visible difference. The HSCA dent is a rounded lip. CE 543 has a dent that looks like it was center punched in the middle. Nobody has duplicated it.